Project Evaluation as an Aid to Planning: How Successful has the Innovation Been?

  • Azizur Rahman Khan


During the late 1960s and early 1970s development economics came to put a great deal of emphasis on comprehensive methods of social cost-benefit analysis for the appraisal of investment projects. Project planning was seen as a complement to, even a substitute for, economy-wide planning models that had become fashionable in the fifties and sixties. It was widely believed that these models did not provide adequate guidance for investment decisions. In contrast, it was felt, social cost-benefit analysis of projects held out the greatest promise for efficient investment decisions. The application of the method would not only ensure an efficient allocation of resources: it also emphasised growth by permitting an appropriately high valuation of savings, which were relatively scarce. Moreover, the method was able to take equity into account by assigning distributional weights to benefits accruing to different income and social groups. The purpose of this short paper is to argue that the promise that this innovation held out has been less than fulfilled, and to suggest reasons for this.


Shadow Price Project Evaluation True Objective Shadow Prex Comprehensive Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chenery, Hollis B. (1953),‘Application of Investment Criteria’, Quarterly Journal Review (QJE), February 1953.Google Scholar
  2. Dobb, Maurice (1960) An Essay on Economic Growth and Planning, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Eckaus, R.S. (1955),‘Factor Proportions in Underdeveloped Countries’, American Economic Review, September 1955.Google Scholar
  4. Galenson, Walter and Harvey Leibenstein, (1955),‘Investment Criteria, Productivity and Economic Development’, QJE, August 1955.Google Scholar
  5. Kahn, A.E. (1951),Investment Criteria in Development Programs’, QJE, February 1951.Google Scholar
  6. Little, I.M.D., (1982) Economic Development: Theory, Policy and International Relations, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Little, I.M.D. and J.A. Mirrlees, (1974) Project Appraisal and Planning for the Developing Countries, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. OECD (1968) Manual of Industrial Project Analysis for Developing Countries, vol. II, Social Cost-Benefit Analysis, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Ray, Anandarup (1984) Issues in Cost Benefit Analysis, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Sen, Amartya (1968) Choice of Techniques, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Squire, Lyn and Herman van der Tak (1975) Economic Analysis of projects, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Tinbergen, Jan (1958) Design of Development, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. UNIDO, (1972) Guidelines for Project Evaluation, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Azizur Rahman Khan and Rehman Sobhan 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azizur Rahman Khan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations