Abstract
As indicated in Chapter 2, a multi-perspective analysis contains motivational and structural elements, long and short-term factors, pre-and post-decision analyses, as well as consideration of variables on different analytical levels. It is with this expectation that a psycho-cultural model is introduced in this chapter. There is no doubt that various aspects of culture affect foreign policy behaviour.1 However, the processes through which cultural factors exert their influence are difficult to conceptualise. Culture is a discredited factor both because it cannot be quantified easily despite various attempts,2 and because there is the unlikely assumption that people who share the same cultural background would behave in the same way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See B. Knudsen, ‘The Paramount Importance of Cultural Sources: American Foreign Policy and Comparative Foreign Policy Research Reconsidered’, Cooperation and Conflict 22 (1987): 87–113;
J. P. Lovell, ‘Cultural and Foreign Policy’, a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Washington, D.C., April 16, 1987;
C. Lord ‘American Strategic Culture’, Comparative Strategy 5, 3 (1985): 269–93;
P. E. Rohrlich, ‘Economic Culture and Foreign Policy’, International Organization 41 (1987): 61–92;
W. B. Earle, ‘Conceptualization and Measurement of Drama in Foreign Policy’, a paper presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Meadowlands, N J (July 1–5, 1988).
See K. W. Thompson (ed.) Moral Dimensions of American Foreign Policy (New Brunswick: Transaction Books); Jack Holm, The Mood/Interest Theory of American Foreign Policy (Lexington: University of Kentucky, 1985);
Arthur Schlesinger, The Cycles of American History, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1986);
Ole Holsti and J. Rosenau, American Leadership in World Affairs (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1984).
Martin Sampson, ‘Culture and Foreign Policy Change’, a paper presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Meadowlands, NJ (July 1–5, 1988);
J. Walter, ‘Nationalism and National Character’, a paper presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (July 1–5, 1988);
D. J. Elkins and R. E. B Simeon, ‘A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?’ Comparative Politics 11, 2 (1979): 127–46.
Lloyd Etheredge, ‘Is American Foreign Policy Ethnocentric? Notes Toward a Propositional Inventory’, a paper presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C. (September 1–4, 1988); ‘Nuclear Deterrence Without the Rationality Assumption: Dramatic Requirements and the Agenda for Learning’, a paper presented at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, San Francisco (7 July 1987); Can Government Learn: American Foreign Policy and Central American Revolutions (New York: Pergamon, 1985); ‘President Reagan’s Counseling’, Political Psychology 5, 4 (1984): 737–40;
D. I. Kertzer, Ritual, Politics, and Power (New Haven: Yale University, 1988).
Chih-yu Shih, ‘National Role Conception as Foreign Policy Motivation: The Psychocultural Bases of Chinese Diplomacy’, Political Psychology 9, 4 (1988); Martha Cottam, Foreign Policy Decision Making (Boulder: Westview, 1986);
Stephen Walker (ed.), Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis (Durham: Duke University); C. Backman, ‘Role Theory and International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 14 (1970): 310–19;
John Stoessinger, Nations in Darkness (New York: Random House, 1978);
K. Holsti, ‘National Role Conceptions in the study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly 14 (1970): 233–309.
M. Manescu, Economic Cybernetics (Kent: Abacus Press, 1984).
See John Steinbruner, The Cybernetic Theory of Decision (Princeton: University of Princeton, 1974) p. 51;
Maxwell Maltz, Psycho-Cybernetics (New York: Pocket Books, 1966), p. 17.
As to various definitions of cybernetics, see Jiri Klir and M. Valach, Cybernetic Modeling (Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1967) pp. 65–69.
Robin Marra, ‘A Cybernetic Model of the US Defense Expenditure Policymaking Process’, International Studies Quarterly 29, 4 (1985): 361; Steinbruner, op. cit. p. 65.
Kenneth Sayre, Cybernetics and the Philosophy of Mind (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1976).
See ibid., pp. 36–45; V. L. Parsegian, This Cybernetic World of Men, Machine and Earth Systems (Garden City: Doubleday & Company, 1972) pp. 170–3; Klir and Valach, op. cit., pp. 60–2.
See Steinbruner, op. cit., p. 68; Morton A. Kaplan, System and Process in International Politics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967), p. 9;
Ross Ashby, A Design for a Brain (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1960) pp. 41–43.
Rolf Wigand, ‘A Model of Interorganizational Communication among Complex Organizations’, Communication and Control in Society, ed. K. Krippendorff (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1979) p. 376.
See Klous Krippendorff, ‘Introduction’, Communication, ed. Krippendorff, pp. 228–36; Doreen Steg and R. Schulman, ‘Human Transaction and Adapting Behavior’, Communication, ed. Krippendorff, pp. 318–9; Parsegian, op. cit., pp. 47–66; Ya Lerner, Fundamentals of Cybernetics (London: Chapman and Hall, 1972) pp. 77–86;
Ross Ashby, An Introduction of Cybernetics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963) pp. 195–272.
Larry Hirschhorn, Beyond Mechanization (Cambridge: MIT, 1984) p. 1.
William Feindel, ‘The Brian Considered as a Thinking Machine’, Memory, Learning, and Language, ed. W. Feindel (Toronto: University of Toronto, 1960) pp. 77–101.
T. C. Helvey, The Age of Information, An Interdisciplinary Survey of Cybernetics (Englewood Cliffs: Education Technology, 1971) p. 114.
Herbert Simon, ‘Information Storage System Called “Human Memory”’, Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Memory, eds. M. R. Rosenzweig and E. L. Bennett (Cambridge: MIT, 1976) p. 85.
Parsegian, op. cit., pp. 121–50; F. H. George, ‘Behavioral Cybernetics’, Survey of Cybernetics, ed. J. Ross (London: Iliffe Books, 1969), pp. 75–78; Arthur Porter, ‘The Mechanical Representation of Processes of Thought’, Memory, ed. Feindel, pp. 39–40.
G. Marcus, ‘The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates’. American Political Science Review 82, 3 (1988): 737–62.
John McCamant, ‘Governance without Blood’, States as Terrorist, eds. M. Stohl and G. Lopez (Westport: Greenwood, 1984) pp. 13–14; also see Sayre, op. cit., pp. 139–59;
Hanna Pitkin, Wittgenstein and Justice (Berkeley: University of California, 1972) p. 115.
John Hewitt, Self and Society (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1979) pp. 60–61.
Charles Dechert, The Social Impact of Cybernetics (Notre Dame: Unversity of Notre Dame, 1966) pp. 28–29.
Richard Carter, ‘A Journalistic Cybernetic’, Communication, ed. Krippendorff, p. 481; Fred Ricci, ‘Cybernetics and Society’, Progress of Cybernetics, ed. J. Ross (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1970), p. 1136.
See Tom T. Burns, T. Baumgartner and P. Deville, Man, Decision, Society (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1985) p. 9; Anthony Wilden, ‘Changing Frames of Order: Cybernetics and Machina Mundi’, Communication, ed. Frippendorff, pp. 20–1.
Herbert Simon, ‘Motivational and Emotional Controls of Cognition’, Psychological Review 74 (1967): 33–4.
Kenneth Boulding, ‘National Images and International System’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 3 (1959): 122.
Ole Holsti, ‘The Belief System and National Images’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 6 (1962): 244–5.
See David Easton, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965).
Karl Deutsch, The Nerves of Government (New York: The Free Press, 1962) pp. 172–3.
See William Chandler, The Science of History, A Cybernetic Approach (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1984) pp. 65–8.
See William Chandler, The Science of History, A Cybernetic Approach (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1984) pp. 65–8.
Carl Backman, ‘Role Theory and International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 14, 3 (September, 1970): 316.
Theodore Sarbin and V. Allen, ‘Role Theory’, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 1, eds. G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Melon Park: Addison-Wesley, 1969) p. 524.
Michael Ng-Quinn, ‘The Analytic Study of Chinese Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly 27 (1983), p. 221.
Chalmers Johnson, ‘What’s Wrong with Chinese Political Studies?’ Asian Survey 22, 10 (October, 1982), p. 923.
See Peter Van Ness, The Civilizer State (Denver: University of Denver, 1985) pp. 7, 9–11 (Mimeographed).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Chih-yu Shih
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shih, Cy. (1990). Self, Culture, and Drama of Foreign Policy: A Cybernetic Metaphor. In: The Spirit of Chinese Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11156-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11156-5_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11158-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11156-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)