Skip to main content

The Quest for Technological Superiority — A Misunderstanding of War?

  • Chapter
The Changing Strategic Landscape

Part of the book series: Adelphi Papers ((IISSCP))

  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Western military policy assumes technological superiority confers a significant military advantage. The evidence is otherwise. Western technological advantages have not offset NATO’s inferiority in combat numbers. History indicates that the military advantages conferred by technology are transitory against an adaptive opponent and innovation is more expensive than imitation. Nor does technology have the impact upon higher-order tactics and strategy that is commonly presumed. This Paper develops these issues and concludes with an alternative, classicist approach to Western security.

The author wishes to thank Prof. David Greenwood, Lt-Gen. Dr Franz Uhle-Wettler and Dr Zeev Bonen for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this Paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David Greenwood, ‘Towards Role Specialization’, in NATO’s Sixteen Nations, July 1986, pp. 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

François Heisbourg

Copyright information

© 1989 International Institute for Strategic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Canby, S.L. (1989). The Quest for Technological Superiority — A Misunderstanding of War?. In: Heisbourg, F. (eds) The Changing Strategic Landscape. Adelphi Papers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11129-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics