Black Africa pp 121-172 | Cite as

Political Development

  • Donald George Morrison
  • Robert Cameron Mitchell
  • John Naber Paden

Abstract

Political developments in Black African states in the post-independence period have prompted confusion, despair and insecurity among those interested in the area. The well-justified approval of the “liberation” of African peoples from colonial regimes gave rise to optimism about the unity and legitimacy of victorious nationalist leaders and movements, and obscured the profound obstacles to subsequent development in these new states. In the euphoria of anti-colonial nationalism, the ideological and institutional superstructures of the new nations—the vaunted aspirations for self-determination, neutralism, positive action, African unity and African socialism, the new elites, political parties, and elections—attracted attention and admiration. But ‘the tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living,” and names, battle cries and costumes borrowed from the spirits of the past1 quickly distorted the promise of the new political kingdom.

Keywords

Depression Europe Transportation Income Coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    K. Marx, The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (New York: International, 1964).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See the discussion of sequential processes of political development in Lucian Pye, Aspects of Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown, 1966)Google Scholar
  3. L. Binder, ed., Crises of Political Development (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
  4. Michael F. Lofchie, “Representative Government, Bureaucracy and Political Development: The African Case,” Journal of Developing Areas, 2 (October 1967): 37–55.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    See, for example, James O’Connell, “The Inevitability of Instability,” Journal of Modern African Studies, V (March 1967): 181–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edward Feit, “Military Coups and Political Development: Some Lessons from Ghana and Nigeria,” World Politics, XX (January 1963): 173–93Google Scholar
  7. Aristide Zolberg, “The Structure of Political Conflict in the New States of Tropical Africa,” American Political Science Review, LXII (March 1968): 70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henry Bienen, ed., The Military Intervenes (New York: Russell Sage, 1968): pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    See the comparison of the concepts “change,” “movement,” and “development” in Adam Schaff’s contribution to Raymond Aron, ed., Symposium on Social Development (Paris: UNESCO, 1961).Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    Contemporary students of political development define their subject matter in terms of any, or all, of the following characteristics of nations: (1) structural differentiation, institutionalization, and autonomy within the political system; (2) the integration of formerly diverse cultural elements and the collective acquisition of national loyalties; (3) higher magnitudes of popular participation and equality of opportunity in political life; (4) greater centralization and distributive capacity in the political system; and (5) stability in the exercise of political authority. Details and variations in the definition of political development along these lines can be seen in the publications issued under the auspices of the Committee on Comparative Politics of the Social Science Research Council. For a useful summary of conceptualization and data collection in studies of political development, see Raymond F. Hopkins, “Aggregate Data and the Study of Political Development,” Journal of Politics, 31 (1969), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Scarritt, Political Development and Cultural Change Theory: A Propositional Synthesis with Applications to Africa (Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage, 1972).Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    Ivo K. Feierabend, Rosalind L. Feierabend, and Betty A. Nesvold, “Social Change and Political Violence: Cross-National Patterns” in The History of Violence in America, eds. Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr (New York: Bantam Books, 1969), pp. 632–37.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    Ted Gurr, “Psychological Factors in Civil Violence,” World Politics, 20 (1968): 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 9.
    R.J. Rummel, “Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within Nations, 1946–59,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10(1966): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 10.
    Harry Eckstein, ed., Internal War: Problems and Approaches (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964).Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    Ted Gurr, “A Causal Model of Civil Strife: A Comparative Analysis Using New Indices,” American Political Science Review, 68 (1968): 1104–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ted Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  18. 13.
    Raymond Tanter, “Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within and Between Nations, 1957–60,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10 (1966): 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    D.P. Bwy, “Political Instability in Latin America: The Cross-Cultural Test of a Causal Model,” Latin American Research Review, 3 (1968); 17–66.Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    See the discussion in Harry Eckstein, “On the Etiology of Internal War,” History and Theory, 4 (1965), especially p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 18.
    P.A.R. Calvert, “Revolution: The Politics of Violence,” Political Studies, 15 (1967): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 19.
    Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr., Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis (New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1973).Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    Bruce M. Russett, et al., World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964), 97–98.Google Scholar
  24. C. L. Taylor and M. Hudson, World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators 2nd edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  25. 21.
    A comparable typology is sketched in James N. Rosenau, “Internal War as an International Event,” in James Rosenau, ed., International Aspects of Civil Strife (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1964), pp. 45–91.Google Scholar
  26. D. G. Morrison and H. M. Stevenson, “Political Instability in Independent Black Africa: More Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within Nations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, XV, 3 (Sept. 1971): 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 23.
    Violence, like instability, is variously defined, but includes behaviors ranging from activity intended to injure physically, to actions that flout institutionalized expectations of “proper” behavior. See Chalmers Johnson, Revolution (Stanford: Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 1964), p. 8Google Scholar
  28. H. L. Nieburg, Political Violence (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969), p. 13.Google Scholar
  29. 25.
    See D. G. Morrison and H. M. Stevenson, “Political Instability in Independent Black Africa: More Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within Nations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, XV (September 1971): 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 27.
    See A. Wells, “The Coup D’Etat in Theory and Practice: Independent Black Africa in the 1960’s,” American Journal of Sociology, 79 (January 1974): 871–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 28.
    See William R. Thompson, The Grievances of Military Coup-Makers (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1973), Appendix A.Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    Irma Adelman and Cynthia Taft Morris, Society, Politics and Economic Development (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    Cf. Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
  34. Brunner and Brewer, Organized Complexity: Empirical Theories of Political Development (New York: Free Press, 1971)Google Scholar
  35. H. Eckstein and T.R. Gurr, Authority Patterns (New York: Wiley, 1975).Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    Gabriel A. Almond and James A. Coleman, eds. The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  37. 34.
    The importance of these variable characteristics of individual parties rather than the general structure of the party system has long been argued in the study of African politics. Cf. Ruth Schachter Morgenthau, “Single-Party Systems in West Africa,” American Political Science Review, 55 (1961): 304–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas Hodgkin, African Political Parties (London: Penguin Books, 1961), pp. 155–159Google Scholar
  39. Aristide Zolberg, One-Party Government in the Ivory Coast (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1964), p. 9Google Scholar
  40. Martin Kilson, “Authoritarian and Single-Party Tendencies in African Politics,” World Politics, 15 (1963): p. 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peter Harries-Jones, Freedom and Labour: Mobilization and Political Control on the Zambian Copperbelt (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975).Google Scholar
  42. Henry Bienen, Tanzania: Party Transformation and Economic Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
  43. 35.
    This is obviously a restrictive statement of the economic role of government. The concern with fiscal policy and the neglect of monetary policy is, however, appropriate in the African context, where the ability of governments to control the value and availability of money is restricted by the absence of developed financial institutions, and by the external controls over African currency exercised by the governments of foreign countries, whose central banks control the international standards of exchange used in Africa. For a discussion of the role of government in economic development see Ursula Hicks, Development Finance: Planning and Control (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
  44. Otto Eckstein, “A Summary of the Theory of Public Expenditures,” in Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization (Princeton, N.J.: National Bureau and Princeton University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
  45. A.R. Prest, Public Finance in Underdeveloped Countries (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1962).Google Scholar
  46. 36.
    See Joseph J. Spengler, “Bureaucracy and Economic Development.” in Joseph LaPalombara, ed., Bureaucracy and Political Development (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963), especially pp. 223–232Google Scholar
  47. Albert Waterson, Development Planning: Lessons of Experience (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966)Google Scholar
  48. Martin Stanisland, “Colonial Government and Populist Reform: The Case of the Ivory Coast-I and II,” Journal of Administration Overseas, X (January, April 1971): 33–42Google Scholar
  49. 37.
    Rimmer, D, “The Abstraction from Politics: A Critique of Economic Theory and Design with Reference to West Africa,” Journal of Development Studies, 5 (April), 190–204. For a review of the contemporary political economy of African states see M. J. Grieve and T. M. Shaw “The Political Economy of Africa: Internal and International Inequalities,” Cultures et Developpement, 10 (1978): 609–48.Google Scholar
  50. 38.
    See a preliminary analysis of the integrative and disintegrative effects of patterns of political centralization in D. G. Morrison and H. M. Stevenson, “Integration and Instability: Patterns of African Political Development,” American Political Science Review, LXVI (September 1972): 902–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 39.
    See Thomas Lee Roberts, Judicial Organization and Institutions of Contemporary West Africa: A Profile (New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1966)Google Scholar
  52. 40.
    “Any human society...does not possess a single consistent legal system, but as many such systems as there are functioning subgroups. Conversely, every functioning subgroup of a society regulates the relations of its members by its own legal system, which is of necessity different, at least in some respects, from those of the other groups.” Leopold Popisil, “Legal Levels and Multiplicity of Legal Systems in Human Societies,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11 (March 1967): 3.Google Scholar
  53. 41.
    Peter C. Lloyd, ed., The New Elites of Tropical Africa (New York: Oxford University Press, 1966), p. 8.Google Scholar
  54. 43.
    The best general statement of this shift is Aristide Zolberg, “The Structure of Political Conflict in the New States of Tropical Africa,” American Political Science Review, LXII (March 1968): pp. 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 44.
    For details of these arguments, see Chalmers Johnson, ed., The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962)Google Scholar
  56. Samuel P. Huntington, ed. Changing Patterns of Military Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  57. Harvey Glickman, “The Military in African Politics: A Bibliographic Essay,” African Forum, 2 (Summer 1966): 73Google Scholar
  58. H. Bienen, ed., The Military and Modernization (Chicago: Aldine, 1971).Google Scholar
  59. 45.
    See Morris Janowitz, The Military in the Development of New Nations (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  60. Kenneth Grundy, Conflicting Images of the Army in Africa (Nairobi: East Africa Publishing House, 1968)Google Scholar
  61. Henry Bienen, ed., The Military Intervenes: Case Studies in Political Development (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1968)Google Scholar
  62. Ernest W. Lefever, Spear and Scepter: Army, Police and Politics in Tropical Africa (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1970)Google Scholar
  63. J. M. Lee, African Armies and Civil Order (London: Chatto and Windus, 1969)Google Scholar
  64. A. B. Bozeman Conflict in Africa: Concepts and Realities (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.)Google Scholar
  65. 46.
    See Janowitz, op. cit., and the excellent case study by Robin Luckham, The Nigerian Military (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  66. 47.
    Cf. W.F. Gutteridge, Military Institutions and Power in the New States (London, 1964); and James Coleman and Belmont Brice, Jr., “The Role of the Military in Sub-Saharan Africa,” in The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries, Johnson, ed., (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  67. W. F. Gutteridge Military Regimes in Africa (London: Methuen, 1975)Google Scholar
  68. G. Kennedy The Military in the Third World (London: Duckworth, 1974).Google Scholar
  69. 48.
    Russett, et. al. World Handbook of Social and Political Indicators (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  70. 49.
    See Roger Murray, “Militarism in Africa,” New Left Review, 38 (July–August 1966): 36–39.Google Scholar
  71. 51.
    Cf Ali A. Mazrui and Donald Rothchild, “The Soldier and the State in East Africa: Some Theoretical Conclusions on the Army Mutinies of 1964,” Western Political Quarterly, 20 (March 1967): especially p. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 52.
    Chester A. Crocker, “France’s Changing Military Interests,” Africa Report, June 1968, and Ruth First, The Barrel of a Gun (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1970), p. 422.Google Scholar
  73. 53.
    Cf. Samuel C. Ukpabi, “Military Recruitment and Social Mobility in Nineteenth Century British West Africa,” Journal of Modern African Studies, 2 (Spring 1975): 87–107.Google Scholar
  74. 54.
    Cf. Morrison and Stevenson, “Integration and Instability: Patterns of African Political Development,” and A. Wells, “The Coup D’Etat in Theory and Practice: Independent Black Africa in the 1960’s,” American Journal of Sociology, 79 (January 1974): 871–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Irvington Publishers, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald George Morrison
    • 1
  • Robert Cameron Mitchell
    • 2
  • John Naber Paden
    • 3
  1. 1.Harvard University Office of Information TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.Northwestern UniversityUSA
  3. 3.George Mason UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations