Private Foreign Investment and Welfare in LDCs

  • Monojit Chatterji
  • Sajal Lahiri


The magnitude of the debt crisis facing many LDCs needs almost no comment. Several countries in Latin America and Africa face severe problem of adjustment as a result of the inability to repay their debt. Although the debt problem in these continents are different in both size and nature, the long-run solution to LDC indebtedness can only lie in increased and accelerated development. This is not to deny the important potential role of relief in its various forms (such as food aid), but only to point out the short-run nature of such programmes.


Foreign Investment Intermediate Good Foreign Capital Intermediate Input Small Open Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batra, R. N. and Lahiri, S. (1985) ‘Immiserising Investment from Abroad in a Small Open Economy’, Discussion Paper no. 272, Department of Economics, University of Essex.Google Scholar
  2. Bhagwati, J. N. and Brecher, R. A. (1980) ‘National Welfare in an Open Economy in the Presence of Foreign-owned Factors of Production’, Journal of Inter-national Economics, 10, pp. 102–15.Google Scholar
  3. Brecher, R. A. and Diaz Alejandro, C. F. (1977) ‘Tariffs, Foreign Capital and Immiserising Growth’, Journal of International Economics, 7, pp. 317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brecher, R. A. and Chaudhuri, E. V. (1982) ‘Immiserising Investment from Abroad: The Singer-Prebisch Thesis Reconsidered’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brecher, R. A. and Findlay, R. (1983) ‘Tariffs, Foreign Capital and National Welfare with Sector-Specific Factors’, Journal of International Economics, 14, pp. 277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamada, K. (1974) ‘An Economic Analysis of the Duty-free Zone’, Journal of International Economics, 4, pp. 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helpman, E. and Razin, A. (1983) ‘Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and Factor Movements’, Journal of International Economics, 14, pp. 263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, R. W. (1971) ‘A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History’, in J. N. Bhagwati, et al. (eds) Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
  9. Mcintosh, J. M. (1978) ‘The Econometrics of Growth and Development: A Test of the Dual Hypothesis’, Review of Economic Studies, 45, pp. 285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ono, Y. (1987) ‘Foreign Penetration and National Welfare Under Oligopoly’, ISER Discussion Paper no 156, Osaka University, Japan.Google Scholar
  11. Uzawa, H. (1969) ‘Shihon Jiyuka to Kokumin Keizai’, (Liberalisation of Foreign Investment and the National Economy) Economisuto, 23, pp. 106–122 (in Japanese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© H. W. Singer and Soumitra Sharma 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monojit Chatterji
  • Sajal Lahiri

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations