Skip to main content

‘Pap for the Dispossessed’: Seamus Heaney and the Poetics of Identity

  • Chapter
Seamus Heaney

Part of the book series: New Casebooks ((NECA))

Abstract

The centrality of the question of identity to Irish writing and critical discussion of it since the nineteenth century is not due simply to the contingent influence of political preoccupations. Rather, it indicates the crucial function performed by literature in the articulation of those preoccupations, inasmuch as literary culture is conceived as offering not merely a path towards the resolution, but the resolution itself of the problems of subjective and political identity. At present, the Irish poet whose work has most evidently gained such authority is Seamus Heaney, the dust-jackets of whose volumes of poetry since Field Work carry such banal assertions as ‘Everyone knows by now that Heaney is a major poet…’2 Heaney’s quasi-institutional acceptance on both sides of theAtlantic as a major poet and bearer of the tradition coincides with a tendency to regard his work as articulating important intuitions of Irish identity, and as uttering and reclaiming that identity beyond the divisive label, ‘Anglo-Irishness’. Therefore, it is not untimely to interrogate these assumptions in the context of an historical elaboration of the principal concepts which founded and still dominate literary and political formulations of Irish identity.

I believe they are afflicted with a sense of history that was once the peculiar affliction of the poets of other nations who were not themselves natives of England but who spoke the English language… A desire to preserve indigenous traditions, to keep open the imagination’s supply lines to the past… to perceive in these a continuity of communal ways, and a confirmation of an identity which is threatened — all this is signified by their language.

(Seamus Heaney, ‘Englands of the Mind’, Preoccupations, p. 150)

Seamus Heaney, ‘Hercules and Antaeus’, North (London, 1975), p. 53.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Seamus Heaney, Field Work (London, 1979). The citation is from John Carey, ‘Poetry for the World We Live In’, review of Seamus Heaney, Field Work

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Craig Raine, A Martian Sends a Postcard Home (Oxford, 1979), in the Sunday Times, 18 November 1979, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mark Patrick Hederman, ‘“The Crane Bag” and the North of Ireland’, The Crane Bag (Dublin), 4:2 (1980–1), 102

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Blake Morrison, Seamus Heaney (London, 1982), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous, 15 February 1845, ‘Union Against the Union’, Nation, 11 March 1848, 168. See also E. Kamenka (ed.), Nationalism: The Nature and Evolution of an Idea (London, 1973), pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marx’s ‘Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of the State’ in Early Writings, trans. Rodney Livingstone and Gregor Benton (New York, 1975), pp. 57–197, comprises an extensive critique of the state in terms of the split between the civil state of individualism and the political state of ‘association’.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elie Kedourie’s Nationalism (London, 1961) supplies the wider European context of nationalism, and emphasises the ethical nature of its demands.

    Google Scholar 

  8. it is derived. This, and related terms, are well analysed in Vincent Descombes, Le Même et l’Autre: quarante-cinq ans de philosophie française, 1933–1978 (Paris, 1979), pp. 205–6. Davis’s essay was published in the Nation, 1 April 1843, 394.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sigmund Freud, ‘Some Psychical Consequences of the Anatomical Distinction between the Sexes’, The Complete Psychological Works (London, 1958–68), XIX, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This is the general argument of John Breuily’s persuasive study, Nationalism and the State (New York, 1982), see especially chs 2 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See George Boyce, Nationalism in Ireland (London, 1982), p. 239, where he remarks that ‘one of the most important unifying themes of southern politics after the 1920s was Hibernia Irredenta’.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Difference’ is employed throughout less in the Derridean sense than as the dialectical contrary to the concept of identity, i.e. that which cannot be assimilated to the unity of identitarian thinking. Theodor Adorno argues this to be an inescapable contradiction within such thinking; see Negative Dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton (New York, 1973 ), pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seamus Heaney, Death of a Naturalist (London, 1966), pp. 13–14, and Door into the Dark (London, 1969), pp. 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harold Bloom, ‘The Voice of Kinship’, TLS, 8 (February 1980), pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seamus Heaney, ‘Feeling into Words’, Preoccupations (London, 1980), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank Kinahan, ‘Artists on Art: An Interview with Seamus Heaney’, Critical Inquiry 8:3 (Spring 1982), 406;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. see also Seamus Heaney’s lines in ‘The Ministry of Fear’, North (London, 1975), p. 65: ‘Ulster was British, but with no rights on/The English lyric.’

    Google Scholar 

  18. For further discussion of gender issues in Heaney’s writings that have appeared since this essay was first published, see Elizabeth Butler Cullingford, ‘“Thinking of Her… as… Ireland”: Yeats, Pearse and Heaney’, Textual Practice, 4:1 (Spring 1990), 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. and Patricia Coughlan, ‘“Bog Queens”: The Representation of Women in the Poetry of John Montague and Seamus Heaney’ in Toni O’Brien Johnson and David Cairns (eds), Gender in Irish Writing (Milton Keynes, 1991 ), pp. 88–111.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Richard Kearney’s comments on the intertwining of both aspects of this mythology in ‘The IRA’s Strategy of Failure’, The Crane Bag 4:2 (1980–1), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See the interview with Seamus Heaney in John Haffenden, Viewpoints (London, 1981), pp. 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Coleridge, ‘Essays on Method’, The Friend ed. Barbara Rooke (Princeton, NJ, 1969), p. 476;

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matthew Arnold, ‘On the Study of Celtic Literature’ in R.H. Super (ed.), Lectures and Essays in Criticism vol. III of The Complete Prose Works (Ann Arbor, MI, 1962), p. 330. Adorno comments on the duplication of the mechanical reproductive process in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. See Negative Dialectics p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Kenneth Galbraith, The New Industrial State 2nd edn (Harmondsworth, 1974), especially ch. 5, ‘Capital and Power’. The analysis, if not the conclusion, of this study is valuable, and challenging to any materialist view of the current economy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael Allen

Copyright information

© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lloyd, D. (1997). ‘Pap for the Dispossessed’: Seamus Heaney and the Poetics of Identity. In: Allen, M. (eds) Seamus Heaney. New Casebooks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10682-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics