Abstract
Those who advocate high levels of military research and development (R and D) have frequently argued that these efforts further a variety of non-military goals. It is neither unusual nor inappropriate for advocates of any public policy to point out the side-benefits of the policy they support. Such ‘positive externalities’, as economists call them, have long been accepted as relevant to social policy decisions. For example, supporting public education of children by taxing the general population (including those who have no children in the public school system) has been justified by the general social benefits of a more educated citizenry, not just by the value that directly accrues to the students or their families. But such arguments must be viewed with care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
L. J. Dumas, The Overburdened Economy (Berkeley, California, 1986) pp. 208–11.
National Science Foundation, National Science Board, Science Indicators, 1974 (Washington, DC, 1975); and Science Indicators, 1978 (Washington, DC, 1979).
President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, Global Competition: The New Reality (Washington, DC, 1985).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Unione Scienzati per il Disarmo Convegno Internazionale
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumas, L.J. (1989). Non-Military Justification of Military R and D: Rationality or Rationalisation?. In: Schaerf, C., Reid, B.H., Carlton, D. (eds) New Technologies and the Arms Race. Studies in Disarmament and Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10615-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10615-8_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-10617-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-10615-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)