Skip to main content

The Phantom at the Limits of Criminology

  • Chapter
Watching the Detectives

Abstract

These two Gothic revelations mark respectively a beginning and an ending. The beginning is that of what became known as the ‘science of criminology’, generally accepted as having its origin in this discovery in 1870 by the Italian physician Cesare Lombroso. It was to lead to an explosion in criminological theory that was felt throughout Europe and the United States. The criminal might be identified, categorised by science, and science was to be in the vanguard of the fight against crime. The ending is that of a crime novel, Fantômas, written by Marcel Allain and Pierre Souvestre and published in 1911. The book (published in translation most recently by Picador in 1987) was a sensation in its time-thirty-one sequels immediately followed it, and five films by the director Louis Feuillade were released. As the above quotation demonstrates, it is a work in which the criminal evades capture, thereby proving his superiority over the scientific theory and practice ranged against him.

I was carrying on for several months researches in the prisons and asylums of Pavia upon cadavers and living persons in order to determine upon substantial differences between the insane and criminals, without succeeding very well. At last I found in the skull of a brigand a very long series of atavistic anomalies…. At the sight … of these strange anomalies the problem of the nature and of the origin of the criminal seemed to me resolved. This was not merely an idea, but a flash of inspiration. At the sight of that skull I seemed to see, all of a sudden, lighted up as a vast plain under a flaming sky the problem of the nature of the criminal.1

He thrust the assistants away, and plunging his hands into the hay that was soaked with blood, he seized the severed head by the hair and stared at it … ‘Oh, curse him! Fantomas has escaped! Fantômas has gotten away! He has had some innocent man executed in his stead! I tell you, Fantômas is alive!’2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. C. Lombroso, Crime: Its Causes and Remedies (London: William Heinemann, 1911) p. xiv as quoted in D. Garland, The Criminal and his Science’, British Journal of Criminology, 25 (1985) pp. 109–37, see esp. p. 111. For general accounts of the development of criminological thought, see also L. Radzinowicz and R. Hood, A History of English Criminal Law, vol. 5 (London: Stevens, 1986) pp. 3–88; H. Mannheim, Comparative Criminology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965). On particular figures in the history of criminology, see H. Mannheim (ed.), Pioneersin Criminology (London: Stevens, 1960). The fullest and most incisive account of French thought on crime and criminology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is Robert A. Nye’s Crime, Madness and Politics in Modern France: The Medical Concept of National Decline (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984). I would like to thank Philip Rawlings for his help in providing references.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Allain and P. Souvestre, Fantômas, with an introduction by J. Ashberry (London: Pan, 1987) p. 324. This edition and translation have been used throughout and page numbers within the text refer to this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On which see, for example, S. S. Diamond and C. J. Herhold, ‘Understanding Criminal Sentencing: Views from Law and Social Psychology’, in G. M. Stephenson and J. M. Davies (eds), Progress in Social Psychology, vol. 1 (Chichester: Wiley, 1981) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Zola, La Bête Humaine, trans, and with an introduction by L. W. Tancock (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin, 1977) p. 9. For Zola’s views on the novel and science, see his essay ‘The Experimental Novel’ as reproduced in G. J. Becker (ed.), Documents of Modern Literary Realism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963) p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Foucault, Surveiller et Punir, trans. as Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin, 1977) p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur Conan Doyle, A Study in Scarlet, the passage is quoted in Humphrey Jennings, Pandaemonium (London: Pan, 1987) p. 353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Richard W. Ireland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ireland, R.W. (1990). The Phantom at the Limits of Criminology. In: Bell, I.A., Daldry, G. (eds) Watching the Detectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10591-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics