The Strength of the Left Communist Movement: Moscow, the Urals and the Ukraine

  • Ronald I. Kowalski
Part of the Studies in Soviet History and Society book series (SSHS)

Abstract

How strong was the Left Communist movement in Russia in the first half of 1918? Surprisingly, little detailed attention has been paid to this question, particularly in Western studies. Admittedly, some generalisations have been put forward. For example, Leonard Schapiro remarked that in January and February of 1918 the Left Communists ‘enjoyed considerable support in the rank and file…’, while Stephen Cohen has gone even further, claiming that ‘at the peak of their political strength against the peace treaty, the Left Communists represented an enthusiastic mass movement, probably a majority in the party’.1 Little more substantial evidence has been offered. Even less has been said about the support that they possessed in the months after the peace was signed when they were in marked decline, apart, that is, from broad allegations that they retained strongholds in the Moscow industrial region, the Urals and the Ukraine.2 Questions of the actual extent of their support and why it should have survived in these regions have remained basically unexplored.

Keywords

Migration Europe Expense Defend Vasil 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Serebriakova, Oblastnye obˮedineiia Sovetov, p. 91. Until the spring of 1918 the Moscow region encompassed the provinces of Iaroslavl’, Kaluga, Kostroma, Moscow, Nizhegorod, Orel’, Riazan’, Smolensk, Tambov, Tula, Tver, Vladimir and Voronezh. V. Iakovleva, ‘Partiinaia rabota v Moskovskoi oblasti v period fevral’ — oktiabr’ 1917g.’, Proletarskaia Revoliutsiia, 3 (1923), p. 197.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Ocherki istorii Moskovskoi organizatsii KPSS, II (Moscow, 1983), pp. 50ff.; Sed’moi sˮezd, pp. 312–13; Sotsial-Demokrat, 17 January 1918; Pravda, 21 January 1918; Varlamov, Razoblachenie, p. 82.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    Izvestiia Moskvy, 26 February, 3 March 1918. K. Ukhanov, I. Borisov, Iz zhizni i deiatel’nosti Soveta R i K D Rogozhko-Simonovskogo raiona g. Moskvy (mart 1917g — ianvar’ 1921g) (Moscow, 1921), p. 21. Sotsial-Demokrat, 5 March 1918 carries a report sketching the same picture of militancy in the districts of the city at the end of February.Google Scholar
  4. 18.
    Sed’moi sˮezd, pp. 300–2; Istoricheskii arkhiv, 3 (1958), p. 28; Chubar’ian, Brestskii mir, p. 221, claims that many local organisations, including the important ones in Liudvinsk and Zhidra, opposed peace; and Pravda, 20 January 1918.Google Scholar
  5. 19.
    Istoricheskii arkhiv, 3 (1958), pp. 21–2, 29; Sotsial-Demokrat, 28 February 1918; Otchet, pp. 124, 127.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    Istoricheskii arkhiv, 4 (1958), p. 37; Otchet, pp. 115, 118; Chubar’ian, Brestskii mir, pp. 222–3.Google Scholar
  7. 22.
    Ibid., pp. 225, 228; Pravda, 5 March 1918. The Smolensk party organisation had abandoned revolutionary war as early as 23 February, Sed’moi sˮezd, p. 343.Google Scholar
  8. 28.
    M. N. Pokrovskii, Oktiabr’skaia revoliutsiia (Moscow, 1921), p. 17; Service, Bolshevik Party, p. 81.Google Scholar
  9. 29.
    Vindzberg, ‘l-i Moskovskoi revoliutsionnyi dobrovol’cheskii otriad po bor’be s kontr-revoliutsiei’, Put’ k Oktiabriu, 3 (Moscow, 1923), p. 119.Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    R. Sakwa, Soviet Communists in Power. A Study of Moscow during the Civil War, 1918–21 (London, 1988), pp. 138–9, accepts that the reregistration of party members may have been directed against the Left Communists but concludes that the available evidence permits no definitive judgment to be made regarding the impact of this process.Google Scholar
  11. 40.
    Kommunist, 3, 1918, pp. 18–19; Ocherki po istorii revoliutsionnogo dvizheniia i bol’shevistskoi organizatsii v Baumanskom raione (Moscow, 1928), p. 173.Google Scholar
  12. 45.
    Kommunist, 4 (1918), p. 16. At the conference of the district party the fairly strong organisations in Ivanovo-Voznesensk itself, Kineshma, Kovrov and Rodniki were represented, as well as those of Teikovo, Sereda, Shuia, Kokhma, Vichuga and Iuzha.Google Scholar
  13. 46.
    Ibid., pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
  14. 47.
    Professional’nyi Vestnik, 9–10 (1918), p. 14; Vestnik Metallista, 3 (1918), pp. 75–8.Google Scholar
  15. 49.
    Ocherki KP Urala, pp. 131–3; Istoricheskii arkhiv, 3 (1958), pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  16. 50.
    O. H. Radkey, The Sickle under the Hammer. The Russian Socialist Revolutionaries in the Early Months of Soviet Rule (New York, 1963), pp. 121–3, 154, 300; J. Keep, ‘October in the Provinces’, in Pipes (ed.), Revolutionary Russia, pp. 248–9; Pravda, 26 April 1918, reported that at the Congress of Soviets of Perm’ province in April the Left SRs outnumbered the Bolsheviks 307 to 211.Google Scholar
  17. 58.
    Berlina, Brestskii mir’, p. 43.Google Scholar
  18. 60.
    Sed’moi sˮezd, p. 330; for Usievich, M. P. Khil’chenko, ‘Inostrannye gruppy RKP(b) na Urale’, Iz istorii partiinykh organizatsii Urala (Sverdlovsk, 1966), p. 4.Google Scholar
  19. 63.
    Oznobishin, K istorii bor’by, pp. 37–8; Sed’moi sˮezd, pp. 332–4; Bol’sheviki Ekaterinburga vo glave mass (Sverdlovsk, 1962), p. 272; for accusations levelled against the Ekaterinburg Bolsheviks, Vpered, 15, 16, 25 May 1918.Google Scholar
  20. 64.
    E. Preobrazhenskii, ‘Sˮezd neobkhodim’, Kommunist, 4 (1918), p. 13; Pravda, 8 May 1918; Sed’moi sˮezd, p. 334; Ocherki KP Urala, pp. 333–4.Google Scholar
  21. 66.
    Kommunist, 4 (1918), pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  22. 68.
    Kommunist, 4 (1918), p. 19; Izvestiia Ural’skogo Oblastnogo Soveta, 18 May 1918.Google Scholar
  23. 70.
    P. S. Flenley, ‘Workers’ Organisations in the Russian Metal Industry, February 1917–August 1918’ (Ph.D., Birmingham, 1983), p. 491; Sirianni, Workers’ Control, pp. 115–16.Google Scholar
  24. 75.
    Rabochii klass Urala v gody voiny i revoliutsii, 1 (Sverdlovsk, 1927), p. vii; Keep, Russian Revolution, pp. 285, 364. Anweiler, The Soviets, pp. 48–9, for Soviets in the mining districts of the Urals in 1905 prepared to engage in armed struggle.Google Scholar
  25. 76.
    Rabochii klass, pp. xv–xvi; J. H. Bater, R. A. French (eds), Studies in Russian Historical Geography, 2 (Orlando, 1983), pp. 380f.Google Scholar
  26. 77.
    S. Berk, ‘The “Class Tragedy” of Izhevsk: Working-Class Opposition to Bolshevism in 1918’, Russian History, 2 (1975), p. 177; Rabochii klass, pp. 21–3; M. Vladimirov, ‘Ura’skaia metallurgiia i rabochii klass do i vo vremia voiny’, Vestnik Metallista, 1 (1917), pp. 28–32; and Baevskii, Partiia, p. 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 84.
    J. Bushnell, ‘G. L. Piatakov’, in J. L. Wieczynski (ed.), Modern Encyclopedia of Russian and Soviet History, 28 (Gulf Breeze, 1982), p. 67.Google Scholar
  28. 86.
    For the narrow definition adopted by the Provisional Government, R. P. Browder, A. F. Kerensky (eds), The Russian Provisional Government, 1 (Stanford, 1961), p. 396. The Rada staked its claim in its Third Universal, Bunyan, Bolshevik Revolution, pp. 435–8.Google Scholar
  29. 87.
    E. Bosh, God bor’by (Moscow, 1925), pp. 25–6; Pipes, Formation, ppl. 128–9; J. Borys, The Sovietisation of the Ukraine, 1917–1923 (Edmonton, 1980), pp. 134, 141–2.Google Scholar
  30. 89.
    V. Zatonskii, ‘K piatletiiu KP(b)U’, Pervyi sˮezd KP(b)U, 5–12 iiulia 1918 goda (Khar’kov, 1923), p. 14; also E. Kviring, ‘Nashi raznoglasiia’, ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
  31. 90.
    Ibid., pp. 62, 73.Google Scholar
  32. 91.
    Pipes, Formation, p. 132; Daniels, Conscience, p. 98; Kviring, Raznoglasiia, p. 6; A. E. Adams, Bolsheviks in the Ukraine. The Second Campaign, 1918–1919 (New Haven, 1963), pp. 18–19; S. Mazlakh, V. Shakhrai, On the Current Situation in the Ukraine (Ann Arbor, 1970), pp. 36, 192.Google Scholar
  33. 92.
    Bosh, God bor’by, pp. 251–3; ‘K osveshcheniiu voprosov istorii Kommunisticheskoi partii Ukrainy’, Kommunist Ukrainy, 6 (1959), p. 43.Google Scholar
  34. 93.
    Otchet, p. 130; Bol’shevistskie organizatsii Ukrainy (noiabr’ 1917 – aprel’ 1918gg.) (Kiev, 1962), pp. 596–7.Google Scholar
  35. 110.
    Istoricheskii arkhiv, 3 (1958), p. 27, 4 (1958), p. 31.Google Scholar
  36. 122.
    I.T.S., ‘V bor’be s kontr-revoliutsiei’, Kommunist, 4 (1918), p. 2; I. Kulik, ‘Revoliutsionnoe dvizhenie na Ukraine’, Zhizn’ Natsional’nostei, 4 (1919).Google Scholar
  37. 125.
    Kviring, Raznoglasiia, pp. 6–7; Pipes, Formation, p. 132; Bosh, God bor’by, p. 219; V. Bilinsky, ‘The Communist Take-over of the Ukraine’, in T. Hunczak (ed.), The Ukraine, 1917–1921: A Study in Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), p. 114.Google Scholar
  38. 126.
    Kommunist Ukrainy, 1–2 (1918), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  39. 127.
    Ibid., pp. 20–1.Google Scholar
  40. 128.
    Ibid., 3–4 (1918), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  41. 129.
    Ibid., pp. 26–30. At the conference itself the Kievan delegate complained that the rank-and-file in the Ukraine had no knowledge of the proceedings and decisions of the Seventh Party Congress. Kulik, Revoliutsionnoe dvizhenie, exaggerated the extent of Bolshevik revival in the summer of 1918.Google Scholar
  42. 130.
    Kommunist Ukrainy, 3–4(1918), p. 25.Google Scholar
  43. 135.
    ‘Iz deiatel’nosti TsK KP(b)U i TsVRK v period mezhdu I i II sˮezdami KP(b)U’, Letopis’ revoliutsii (Khar’kov), 1 (1927), pp. 155–6.Google Scholar
  44. 139.
    Adams, Bolsheviks in the Ukraine, pp. 124–35; J. E. Mace, Communism and the Dilemmas of National Liberation. National Communism in the Soviet Ukraine, 1918–1933 (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), pp. 34–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ronald I. Kowalski 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald I. Kowalski
    • 1
  1. 1.Worcester College of Higher EducationUK

Personalised recommendations