Skip to main content

The Monopoly of Midas Congress and Political Action Committees

  • Chapter
The Phenomenon of Political Marketing

Abstract

Political marketing is a consequence of the gradual recognition that a consumer society, where individual personality becomes almost an aggregate of consumption experience, would accept a politics clothed with the identity of such consumption experience.

‘No sooner do you set foot upon American ground, than you are stunned by a kind of tumult; a confused clamor is heard on every side; and a thousand simultaneous voices demand the satisfaction of their social wants.’

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. McKay, David, American Politics and Society (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oakes, John B., ‘The Pac-Man’s Game: Eating Legislators’, New York Times, 6 Sept. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clymer, Adam, ‘84 PACs gave more to Senate Winners’, New York Times, 6 Jan. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lipsom, J., ‘2 N.Y. Reps Among Top “Pac-Men”’, New York Post, 4 Jan. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berke, Richard L., ‘Study Links Contributions To How Lawmakers Voted’, New York Times, 30 Dec. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan, John, ‘That’s How the Money Changes Hands’, New York Times Book Review, 27 Jan. 1985, pp. 9, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Binyon, Michael, ‘Democrats left behind in record spending on television campaigns’, The Times, 31 Oct. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berke, Richard L., ‘Spending Limit up 14% for Primaries’, New York Times, 6 February 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ordovensky, Pat, ‘Realtors, doctors, teachers top list of big givers’, New York Times, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabato, Larry, The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections (New York: Basic Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brannan, Brad, ‘Nacpac in the 80’s’, Campaigns and Elections, Winter 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brad Brannan, ‘Nacpac role in the 1980 Senate elections’, Campaigns and Elections, Spring 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charles Bremner, New York Times, 28 October 1987, ‘Guns for all crusade prospers in US’.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Binyon, ‘Reagan faces cool welcome on prairies’, The Times, 29 September 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ‘Corporate PACs’, by D. R. Kendall, Campaigns and Elections, Spring 1980, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonitati, Robert F., ‘Labor Political Clout in the ’80s: The New Strategies’, Campaigns and Elections, Fall 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adam Clymer, New York Times, 6 Nov. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clymer, Adam, ‘’84 PAC’s gave more to Senate Winners’, New York Times, 6 January 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grigg, John, ‘America’s Flawed Democracy’, The Times 4 Nov. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richard Berke, New York Times, 30 December 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arterton, Christopher, ‘Communications Technology and Governance’, Project on New Communications Technology, ch. 5, Harvard J.F.K. School, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oakes, John B. ‘The PAC-Man’s Game: Eating Legislators’, New York Times, 6 September 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Professor John C. Pittenger, New York Times, 25 March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Fritschler, A.L. and Ross, B.M., How Washington Works (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1987) for discussion of lobbyists (ch. 5) and PAC rules (Appendix E).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twentieth Century Fund, What Price PAC?1984; this supplies data, outlines PAC strategies and suggests possible reforms.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Shaughnessy, N.J. (1990). The Monopoly of Midas Congress and Political Action Committees. In: The Phenomenon of Political Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10352-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics