The Choice of Tenancy Contract
As the textbooks tell us, when there is a complete set of perfectly competitive markets, including those for contingent commodities, it does not matter whether capital hires labour or labour hires capital. This indeterminacy denies any significance to the question of who actually organises production. Moreover, there is no room for diversity of contracts. For prices convey all relevant information and individuals can buy or sell as much of each contingent commodity as they please, taking prices as parametrically given.
KeywordsSugar Maize Income Assure Expense
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F.H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis (San Francisco: Holden-Day).Google Scholar
- Bell, C. and Sussangkarn, C. (1985) The Choice of Tenancy Contract’, World Bank, processed.Google Scholar
- Bell, C. and Zusman, P. (1976) ‘A Bargaining-Theoretic Approach to Crop-sharing Contracts, American Economic Review, vol. 66, pp. 578–88.Google Scholar
- Binswanger, H. and Rosenzweig, M. (1986) ‘Behavioral and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture’, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 22, pp. 503–39.Google Scholar
- Bliss, C. J. and Stern, N. H. (1982) Palanpur: The Economy of an Indian Village (Clarendon Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
- Jaynes, G. D. (1984) ‘Economic Theory and Land Tenure’, in Binswanger, H. and Rosenzweig, M. (eds), Contractual Arrangements, Employment and Wages in Rural Labor Markets in Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
- Newbery, D. M. G. (1977) ‘Risk-sharing, Sharecropping and Uncertain Labour Markets’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, pp. 585–94.Google Scholar
- Pischke, J. D. von et al. (1983) Rural Financial Markets in Developing Countries (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
- Reid, J. D. (1976) ’sharecropping and Agricultural Uncertainty’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 24, pp. 549–76.Google Scholar
- Singh, N. (1987) ‘Theories of Sharecropping’, WP 155 University of California, Santa Cruz (forthcoming in Bardhan, P. K. (ed.), The Economic Theory of Agrarian Institutions (Oxford University Press)).Google Scholar