Competitive Rivalry and the Response of Markets to Innovative Opportunities

  • Paul Geroski
  • Geoffrey Stewart
Part of the Southampton Series in International Economics book series (SOSIE)

Abstract

Technological change is a cumulative process in which each development opens up new opportunities for innovation. A major issue for those concerned with growth in a market economy is the ability of the economic system to respond accurately and rapidly to these new opportunities. One factor which might be expected to promote flexibility is a high degree of competition in markets. Monopoly would then be associated with sluggish and incomplete responses to the emergence of new opportunities. However, in a seminal contribution to the literature, Joseph Schumpeter (1943) argued that markets with large firms enjoying monopoly power will be the most conducive to innovation.1 The possible policy implications of this view are profound, and our goal in this paper is to evaluate its empirical basis.

Keywords

Furnace Petroleum Covariance Propen Rubber 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Z. and Andretsch, D. (1986) The Determinants of Innovations in Large and Small Firms, mimeo, IIM, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Angelmar, R. (1985) ‘Market structure and research intensity in high-technological opportunity industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1962) ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions’, in R.R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press. Reprinted in N. Rosenberg (ed.) (1971) The Economics of Technical Change, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Binks, M. and Jennings, A. (1985) New Firms as a Source of Industrial Regeneration, mimeo, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  5. Comanor, W.S. (1967) ‘Market structure, product differentiation, and industrial research’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 81, pp. 639–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, P. (1986) ‘The theory of technological competition’, in J.E. Stiglitz and G.F. Mathewson (eds.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, K. and Gordon, T. (1984) Characterization of Innovations Introduced on the U.S. Market in 1982, Report for US Small Business Administration by the Futures Group.Google Scholar
  8. Ergas (1984) Why do Some Countries Innovate More than Others?, CEPS, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Feinman, S. and Fuentevilla, W. (1976) Indicators of International Trends in Technical Innovation, Report to National Science Foundation by Gellman Research Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, F.M. and Temin, P. (1973) ‘Returns to scale in research and development: What does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply?’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, pp. 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geroski, P.A. (1986) Innovation, Technological Opportunity and Market Structure, mimeo, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  12. Geroski, P.A. (1987) Innovative Entry, mimeo, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, R. and Newberry, D. (1982) ‘Pre-emptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly’, American Economic Review, Vol. 72, pp. 514–26.Google Scholar
  14. Globerman, S. (1973) ‘Market structure and R&D in Canadian manufacturing industries’, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 13, pp. 69–7.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, A. and Keeble, D. (1984) ‘New firms and rural industrialization in East Anglia’, Regional Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman, J. (1979) ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, K.S. (1984) ‘Determinants of research and development expenditure in UK manufacturing industry’, (mimeo).Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, P. and Cathcart, D. (1979) ‘New manufacturing firms and regional development’, Regional Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 269–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamien, M.I. and Schwartz, N.L. (1982) Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levin, R.C., Cohen, W.M. and Mowery, D.C. (1985) ‘R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses’, American Economic Review’, Papers and Proceedings 75, pp. 20–4.Google Scholar
  21. Lloyd, P. and Mason, C. (1984) ‘Spatial variables in new firm formation in the UK’, Regional Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lunn, J. and Martin, S. (1983) ‘Market Structure, Firm Structure, and Research and Development’, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business Vol. 26, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
  23. O’Farrell, P. and Crouchley, R. (1984) ‘An industrial and spatial analysis of new firm formation in Ireland’, Regional Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pavitt, K., Robson, M. and Townsend, J. (1986) ‘The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK, 1945–83’, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, pp. 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips, A. (1966) ‘Patents, potential competition and technical progress’, American Economic Review, Vol. 56, pp. 301–10.Google Scholar
  26. Reinganum, J.F. (1982) ‘A dynamic game of R&D: Patent protection and competitive behaviour’, Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 671–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scherer, F.M. (1967) ‘Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers’, American Economic Review, Vol. 57, pp. 524–31.Google Scholar
  28. Scherer, F.M. (1980) ‘Industrial market structure and economic performance’, Rand-McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Scherer, F.M. (1984) Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  30. Schott, K. (1976) Investment in private industrial research and development in Britain’, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schrieves, R. (1978) ‘Market structure and innovation: A new perspective’, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schumpeter, J.A. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  33. Utton, M.A. (1979) Diversification and Competition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Waterson, M. and Lopez, A. (1983) ‘The determinants of research and development intensity in the UK’, Applied Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. White, H. (1980) ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica, Vol. 48, pp. 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sven Arndt and George McKenzie 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Geroski
  • Geoffrey Stewart

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations