Eliot and the Mutations of Objectivity

  • Richard Shusterman

Abstract

Eliot’s poetic and critical theory is deservedly renowned for its intense concern with objectivity. Two of his most famous ‘theories’ — the theory of the objective correlative and ‘the Impersonal theory of poetry’, ardently advocate the aim of objectivity and have, whatever their merit, become landmarks of literary theory, inspiring enormous polemical and exegetical discussion. These influential theories, of course, refer specifically to objectivity in the art of the poet rather than that of the critic. But here, as elsewhere, Eliot’s critical theory closely resembles his poetic theory, since, as Eliot himself so often insisted, his criticism was essentially a byproduct of his poetic enterprise. It is not surprising, then, that Eliot’s theory of criticism reveals a similar concern with objectivity and impersonal analysis, which is largely responsible for his being identified as a father of the New Criticism and as an uncompromising champion of critical objectivism.1

Keywords

Dioxide Platinum Posit Defend Lost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    R. M. Hare, Moral Thinking ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981 ) 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 5.
    J. Ruskin, ‘Of the Pathetic Fallacy’, repr. in E. D. Jones (ed.), English Critical Essays (Nineteenth Century) ( London: Oxford University Press, 1946 ) 378.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    See R. Shusterman, ‘Eliot and Logical Atomism’, ELH 49 (1982) 16478; and T. S. Eliot and the Philosophy of Criticism chs. 1–3.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    See K. R. Popper, Objective Knowledge ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 ) 57–60.Google Scholar
  5. 14.
    J. Margolis, ‘Relativism, History, and Objectivity in the Human Studies’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 14 (1984) 1–23. Here page 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 15.
    M. Arnold, ‘The Function of Criticism at the Present Time’, in L. Trilling (ed.), The Portable Matthew Arnold ( New York: Viking, 1949 ) 234.Google Scholar
  7. 27.
    See L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968 ) 59, 72, 81–6.Google Scholar
  8. 32.
    B. Russell, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’ (1918) in D. Pears (ed.), Russell’s Logical Atomism ( London: Fontana, 1972 ) 53.Google Scholar
  9. 35.
    B. Russell, The Problems of Philosophy (1912; repr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959 ) 65.Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    B. Russell, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, 32. This important philosophical problem is discussed at great length in M. Williams, Groundless Belief ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1977 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Shusterman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations