Diplomacy of the United States and Great Britain in the History of Argentine Borders

  • Camilo Rodriguez Berrutti

Abstract

The definition and maintenance of international borders is an especially sensitive political question, and on numerous occasions in the history of Argentina this has drawn in great powers especially Great Britain and the United States. Some of these problems found amicable solutions. Over the last century, there were instances in which Great Britain and the United States were involved in definition and settlement of Argentine borders through arbitrations that were respectfully accepted. At the same time, both of these great powers have affected Argentina’s position adversely in the Malvinas and its territorial waters, as well as in its portion of Antarctica. Disagreements and resentments about frontiers have continued to upset relations both between regional states and between them and the great powers up to the present. Diplomacy relating to borders then tends to merge with general diplomatic trends and reflect overall relations between Argentina and the great powers.

Keywords

Fishing Argentina Aires 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Harold F. Peterson, Argentina y los Estados Unidos (Buenos Aires: EUDEBA, 1970). Spanish translation of Argentina and the United States. See the following section: ‘An official who improperly pretended to assume a representative-diplomatic character. His personality and his lack of training.’Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davison-Sal/Skins, 2 Paine 324. Source: Francis Wharton, A Digest of the International Law of the United States, 2nd edn, Vol. I (Washington: 1887).Google Scholar
  3. E. Fitte, La Agresion Norteamericana a las Islas Malvinas (Buenos Aires: Emece edn, 1986), Document number 97.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    France acknowledged that it had possessed Spanish lands (the Malvinas/ Falkland Islands) and that it had restored the islands to Spain to whom they belonged, with the official acquiescence and without objection of the British government. Julius Goebel, The Struggle for the Malvinas (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1927). Translation and reprint by the Argentine navy in 1950.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Julius Goebel, The Struggle for the Malvinas. The British Foreign Office could not ignore the value of Goebel’s work, using it as a basic source for consultation. See Camilo Rodriguez Berrutti, ‘Una obra senera de imparcialidad cierta’, Revista Universidad (La Plata, Argentina), Vol. 22 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Dean Acheson, US Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 16 (1947).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael A. Morris 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camilo Rodriguez Berrutti

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations