Abstract
‘Equality of opportunity’ is one of the few objectives of social policy that can be said to find support across the whole spectrum of public and political opinion. Karl Marx, John Rawls and R. H. Tawney as well as Milton Friedman, Sir Keith Joseph and many others, all appear to rally around the same banner in a rare display of unity. Thus Rawls, for example, advocates a system in which ‘offices and positions [are] open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity’, while Friedman praises the fact that ‘wherever anything approaching equality of opportunity has existed, the ordinary man has been able to attain levels of living never dreamed of before’.1 Yet this apparent consensus in favour of an equal opportunity objective is largely a mirage. It is achieved only because the concept of equal opportunity is capable of supporting many different interpretations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, A. B. (1980) ‘Income distribution and inequality of opportunity’ IHS Journal, 4, 65–80.
Atkinson, A. B., Maynard A. K. and Trinder C. G. (1983) Parents and Children: Incomes in Two Generations (London: Heinemann).
Conlisk, J. (1977) ‘An exploratory model of the size distribution of income’, Economic Inquiry, 15, 345–66.
Creedy, J. (1985) Dynamics of Income Distribution (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Frankel, C. (1971) ‘Equality of opportunity’ Ethics, 81, 191–207.
Friedman, M. and Friedman R. (1979) Free to Choose (London: Secker & Warburg).
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1980) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Greenhalgh, C. (1980) ‘Male-female wage differentials in Great Britain: is marriage an equal opportunity?’ Economic Journal, 90, 751–75.
Joseph, K. and Sumption J. (1979) Equality (London: John Murray).
Letwin, W. (1983) ‘The case against equality’, in Against Equality, ed. W. Letwin (London: Macmillan).
Meade, J. E. (1976) The Just Economy (London: Allen & Unwin).
Rae, D. (1981) Equalities (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Rawls, J. (1972) The Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Schaar, J. H. (1967) ‘Equality of opportunity, and beyond’, in Equality, ed. J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (New York: Atherton Press).
Sloane, P. J. (ed.) (1980) Women and Low Pay (London: Macmillan).
Sloane, P. J. (1985) ‘Discrimination in the labour market’, in Labour Economics, ed. D. Carline et al. (London: Macmillan).
Taubman, P. (1975) Sources of Inequality in Earnings (Amsterdam: North Holland).
Taubman, P. (1978) ‘The relative influence of inheritable and environmental factors and the importance of intelligence in earnings functions’, in Personal Income Distribution, ed. W. Krelle and A. F. Shorrocks (Amsterdam: North Holland).
Tawney, R. H. (1952) Equalities (London: Allen & Unwin, 4th edn).
Varian, H. (1976) ‘Two problems in the theory of fairness’. Journal of Public Economics, 3/4, 249–60.
Williams, B. (1962) ‘The idea of equality’, in Philosophy, Politics and Society (Second Series), ed. P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Zabalza, A. and Tzannatos Z. (1985) ‘The effect of Britain’s anti-discriminatory legislation on relative pay and employment’, Economic Journal, 95, 679–99.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 The Eugenics Society
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shorrocks, A.F. (1988). The Galton Lecture for 1985: Inequality of Economic Opportunity. In: Keynes, M., Coleman, D.A., Dimsdale, N.H. (eds) The Political Economy of Health and Welfare. Studies in Biology, Economy and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09644-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09644-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09646-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09644-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)