Abstract
Goodhart’s representation of Keynes’s theory of interest is in marked contrast to that of Davidson. The key to this contrast may be found in the last paragraph of Goodhart’s paper, which presents the choice of framework as being ‘a sticky price model’ and ‘a general equilibrium model’. Neither of these allows the notion of behavioural uncertainty in a context of irreversible historical time which was central to Davidson’s interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hill, R. (1990). Three Notes Commenting on Charles Goodhart’s ‘Keynes and Monetarism’. In: Hill, R. (eds) Keynes, Money and Monetarism. Keynes Seminars. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09626-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09626-8_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09628-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09626-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)