Skip to main content

Three Notes Commenting on Charles Goodhart’s ‘Keynes and Monetarism’

  • Chapter
  • 25 Accesses

Part of the book series: Keynes Seminars ((KESE))

Abstract

Goodhart’s representation of Keynes’s theory of interest is in marked contrast to that of Davidson. The key to this contrast may be found in the last paragraph of Goodhart’s paper, which presents the choice of framework as being ‘a sticky price model’ and ‘a general equilibrium model’. Neither of these allows the notion of behavioural uncertainty in a context of irreversible historical time which was central to Davidson’s interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, R. (1990). Three Notes Commenting on Charles Goodhart’s ‘Keynes and Monetarism’. In: Hill, R. (eds) Keynes, Money and Monetarism. Keynes Seminars. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09626-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics