Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Keynes Seminars ((KESE))

  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

Paul raised the question of the multidisciplinary team and asked for comments on its size and breadth of discipline. Schuetz suggested that there was sufficient collaboration between medicals and paramedical staff but the lack was in the scientific education of the clinical people to allow them to interact with scientists and engineers. Both the medical and scientific disciplines needed training in intercommunication. Stimson felt that, with the development of high technology for clinical use, the doctor as traditional team leader was at risk since he could not ask appropriate questions of the other members of the team. Perhaps computer-aided diagnosis systems were needed to assist the doctor to make the best use of the technology. This left, however, the question of who was team leader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Editor information

J. P. Paul A. B. McCruden P. W. Schuetz

Copyright information

© 1988 Bioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paul, J.P., McCruden, A.B., Schuetz, P.W. (1988). Discussion: Bioengineering Education. In: Paul, J.P., McCruden, A.B., Schuetz, P.W. (eds) The Influence of New Technology on Medical Practice. Keynes Seminars. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09609-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09609-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09611-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09609-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics