Skip to main content

The Strategic Background

  • Chapter
The Sea in Soviet Strategy
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

If a credible analysis of the significance of the sea and of maritime forces in Soviet strategy must begin in the realms of her internal political structure and foreign policy, it must continue with an examination of Russia’s overall strategy and an acceptance that hitherto it has been predominantly land-based. Geography, history, as well as perceptions of contemporary threats, all point to this conclusion. It is true that Soviet strategic writing sometimes admits that the advent of nuclear weapons has transformed the nature of war and that the Strategic Rocket Forces have now displaced the Ground Forces as the chief determinants of victory, but the basic concepts are still land-orientated. The main stress has been on general nuclear war, beginning with heavy nuclear strikes against the enemy’s armed forces and economic centres, and immediately followed up and exploited by highly mobile mass armies and their associated air power. On the defensive side, the Soviet homeland must be protected by the Air Defence Forces and damage further limited by extensive civil defence measures covering the population and essential industries.1 In the light of this emphasis, if maritime forces are to have a significant role in Soviet strategy and gain an adequate share of resources, their advocates must convince the political leadership that they have a unique contribution, which cannot be made by land forces, to the central aims of strategic planning; the prevention of nuclear or conventional attack on Soviet territory, or, if deterrence fails, the country’s ability to fight and win a general war.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Accounts of the development of Soviet strategy will be found in Scott and Scott (1979) and Baylis and Segal (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The role of the armed forces in Russia’s history is authoritatively treated in G. H. N. Seton Watson (1977) ‘Russia: Army and Autocracy’ in M. E. Howard (ed.) Soldiers and Governments (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode); Erickson (1962); and Mackintosh (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scott and Scott (1979) chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sokolovskiy (1968). The introduction gives the background to the book’s publication.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., pp. 60, 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., pp. 134–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., pp. 146, 160–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., pp. 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., pp. 254–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 280–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., pp. 299–300.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., pp. 300–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grechko (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., editorial introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., pp. 151–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., pp. 154–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MccGwire (1987) traces the downgrading of nuclear war back to the 1960s; Fitzgerald (1986) analyses Ogarkov’s writings; Herspring (1986) discusses Akhromeyev’s contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gorshkov (1974). See biographical essay in this by J. G. Hibbits, ‘Gorshkov: Architect of the Soviet Navy’ pp. 142–6; MccGwire (1987), Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorshkov (1974) pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., pp. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., pp. 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., pp. 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., pp. 123–34, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gorshkov (1979); MccGwire (1987), Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MccGwire (1980c) pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gorshkov (1979) pp. ix–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., pp. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Young and Sebek (1978) pp. 256–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gorshkov (1979) pp. 156–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., pp. 178–84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. MccGwire (1980c) pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gorshkov (1979) p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., pp. 213–22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., pp. 229–34.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., pp. 274–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., pp. 234–45.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., pp. 278–82.

    Google Scholar 

  44. MccGwire (1980c) pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. An official English language translation of the second edition had been made in the United States. The Morskoi Sbornik articles are discussed in Till (1983) and Suggs (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  46. The best readily available treatment in Chernavin is in Wolstenholme et al. (1986) to which we are greatly indebted. See also Jane’s Defence Weekly, 18 January 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  47. What follows is derived from McConnell (1980), a work based on a most probing analysis of the relevant Soviet strategic literature.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., pp. 42–67.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., pp. 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  51. MccGwire (1987). The argument is summarised in pp. 335–77.

    Google Scholar 

  52. McConnell (1980), p. 40, quoting an article on ‘The Armed Forces and Military Art of the Main Capitalist States after World War II’ in Voennaya istoriya, Moscow 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Bryan Ranft and Geoffrey Till

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ranft, B., Till, G. (1989). The Strategic Background. In: The Sea in Soviet Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09464-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics