Skip to main content

The Metaphysics of Mental Illness

  • Chapter
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

One conceptual dilemma which has had practical repercussions beyond the confines of scholarly debate in philosophy and the human sciences is that surrounding the notion of ‘mental illness’. A polarization of views has taken place, which, in this particular field, has been unproductive, confusing and politically consequential. In the ensuing discussion, I shall try to disentangle some of the contending claims and isolate what I argue to be the defensible positions. In so doing, I shall need to examine the notions of ‘illness’, ‘diagnosis’ and ‘definition’. Hopefully, such elucidation should cast some light upon the intelligibility of psychiatric praxis and its grounding in ordinary reasoning, but will leave open the question of how to resolve some of the better-informed disputes about its transformation as a social institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This is the position first articulated in T. Szasz, The Myth of Mental Illness (Harper & Row, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also T. R. Sarbin, ‘The Scientific Status of the Mental Illness Metaphor’ in S. Plog & R. Edgerton (eds.), Changing Perspectives in Mental Illness (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971), and

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. J. Scheff, ‘Schizophrenia as Ideology’ in his edited collection, Labeling Madness (Spectrum, Prentice-Hall, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. D. Laing, The Politics of Experience (and the Bird of Paradise) (Penguin, 1968) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwig Binswanger, ‘The Case of Ellen West: An Anthropological-Clinical Study’ (trans. W. M. Mendel & J. Lyons) in Rollo May, Ernest Angel & Henri F. Ellenberger (eds.), Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology (Simon & Schuster ed., 1958) p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Tristram Engelhardt Jnr., ‘The Concepts of Health and Disease’ in H. T. Engelhardt Jr. & S. F. Spicker (eds.), Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences (D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1975) p. 136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Michael S. Moore, ‘Some Myths about “Mental Illness”’, Inquiry, Vol. 18, No. 3, Autumn 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard Linsky, Referring (New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Szasz, Ideology and Insanity: Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man (Doubleday-Anchor, 1970) p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alvan R. Feinstein has drawn attention to the existence of ‘diseases’ (e.g. carcinoma of the lung) which can be present prior to, independently of, a person’s being ‘ill’ (—his category for such conditions is lanthanic diseases: see his ‘Boolean Algebra and Clinical Taxonomy’, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 269, October 31, 1964, and

    Google Scholar 

  11. his Clinical Judgment (Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1967), esp. pp. 145–8.) For further support of Moore’s contention, consider the following: ‘…in African communities when air travel did not exist and where malaria was common, having sickle cell trait was not a disvalue at all.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. K. Temerlin, ‘Suggestion Effects in Psychiatric Diagnoses’, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 147, 1968, p. 358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. For an excellent discussion of the history of various psychotropic drugs and the separation of psychopharmacology from organic-aetiological inquiry in psychopathology, see Leon Eisenberg, ‘Psychiatric Intervention’, Scientific American, Vol. 229, No. 3, September 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harold Garfinkel, ‘The Rational Properties of Scientific and Common Sense Activities’ in his Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice-Hall, 1967) p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laurence Kolb, as quoted in Herbert Fingarette, The Meaning of Criminal Insanity (University of California Press, 1972) p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon Sobeloff, ‘Insanity and the Criminal Law: From McNaghten to Durham and Beyond’, American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 41, 1955, p. 877.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van den Berg, as quoted in R. D. Laing, The Divided Self (Pelican, 1965) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. J. Scheff, Being Mentally III: A Sociological Theory (Aldine, 1966) and

    Google Scholar 

  19. his ‘Introduction’ to his edited collection, Mental Illness and Social Processes (Harper & Row, 1967). See also

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arlene K. Daniels, ‘The Philosophy of Combat Psychiatry’ as reprinted in E. Rubington & M. S. Weinberg (eds.), Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective (Macmillan, 1973), from

    Google Scholar 

  21. ‘Normal Mental Illness and Understandable Excuses: The Philosophy of Combat Psychiatry’, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 14, No. 2, Nov/Dec 1970, and

    Google Scholar 

  22. her ‘The Social Construction of Military Psychiatric Diagnoses’ in H. P. Dreitzel (ed.), Recent Sociology Vol. 2: Patterns of Communicative Behavior (Macmillan, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anselm Strauss et al., Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions (Free Press of Glencoe, 1964). See also

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Schatzman & Anselm Strauss, ‘A Sociology of Psychiatry’, Social Problems, Vol. 14, No. 1, Summer 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Phillips & J. G. Draguns in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 22, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. M. Braginsky, D. D. Braginsky & K. Ring, Methods of Madness: The Mental Hospital as a Last Resort (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. David L. Rosenhan, ‘On Being Sane in Insane Places’, Science, Vol. 179, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The referential comparability problem is a problem only for a limited range of theoretical, research purposes; see D. Bannister, ‘The Logical Requirements for Research into Schizophrenia’, British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 114, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Waismann’s classic paper, ‘Verifiability’ in Anthony Flew (ed.), Logic and Language (Anchor Books, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Basil Blackwell, 1968) para. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alan F. Blum, ‘The Sociology of Mental Illness’ in Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings (Basic Books, 1970) p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  32. For some documentation, see M. R. Yarrow et al., ‘The Psychological Meaning of Mental Illness in the Family’ in Rubington & Weinberg (eds.), Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, op. cit., and Kathleen Smith et al., ‘The “Last Straw”; Decision Incidents Resulting in the Request for Hospitalization in One Hundred Schizophrenic Patients’, American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 120, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peter Winch, ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’ in B. R. Wilson (ed.), Rationality (Basil Blackwell, 1974) p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Zhores and Roy Medvedev, A Question of Madness (Penguin, 1971), and the excellent summary of more recent evidence by

    Google Scholar 

  35. Clayton Yeo, ‘The Abuse of Psychiatry in the USSR: The Evidence’, Index on Censorship, Vol. 4, No. 2, Summer 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Jeff Coulter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coulter, J. (1979). The Metaphysics of Mental Illness. In: The Social Construction of Mind. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09379-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics