Abstract
Like the Northern Lights, the aurora borealis, the concept of a nuclear-weapons-free zone in Scandinavia, has miraged on the political horizon of the Nordic countries for a quarter of a century. When it was first introduced by Soviet Premier Bulganin in letters to his Norwegian and Danish colleagues in January 1958, the proposal — an outgrowth of the various nuclear-weapons-free-zone plans for Central Europe the Soviet Union and its allies introduced at the time — was seen by the Danish and Norwegian governments as an effort to weaken the NATO alliance. Accordingly, they responded by demanding that corresponding Soviet territory must be included in any such zone. An article a year later in Izvestiya outlining the advantages of a zone, proved that their assumption had been correct: ‘The creation of a nuclear-free and missile-free zone in Northern Europe could mark the beginning of the appearance of a broad belt of peace in Europe… The formation of such a zone in Northern Europe could also be the first step in the transition of all the Nordic countries to a position of neutrality.’1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Jens Evensen, ‘Norge i en farligare verden’, in Atmvapen og usikkerhetspolitikk, ed. by Thorbjern Jagland, Sverre-Bergh Johansen, Jostein Nyhamar and Arne Treholt (Oslo: Tiden Norsk, 1980) p. 16;
Alva Myrdal, The Game of Disarmament (New York: Pantheon, 1976) p. 247.
Michael Howard, The Causes of Wars (London: Unwin, 1983) p. 164.
Ingemar Dörfer, ‘Pacifism, Nationalism and Neutralism in Europe: Scandinavia’, in Pierre Lellouche (ed.) Pacifisme et dissuasion (Paris: Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, 1983) pp. 115–16.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI Yearbook 1983 (London: Taylor & Francis 1983), p. 101.
J. K. Paasikivi, Am Rande einer Supermacht (Hamburg: Holsten, 1966) pp. 243–4.
Marshall Shulman, Beyond the Cold War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), p. 21.
George Kennan, Russia, the Atom, the West (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958) p. 18;
Adam B. Ulam, Expansion and Coexistence (New York: Praeger, 1968) pp. 610–12;
Seweryn Bialer, ‘The Soviets Really Need Their Nukes’, The Washington Post, 2 May, 1983.
Adam B. Ulam, The Rivals (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) pp.290 and 302.
Olof Palme, Sveriges utrikespolitik (Stockholm: Tiden 1984) pp. 74–5.
N. K. Krushchev, Khrushchev Remembers, ed. by Strobe Talbott (Boston: Bantam Books, 1971) p. 569.
J.J. Holst, ‘The Challenge from Nuclear Weapons and NuclearWeapons-Free Zones’, Bulletin of Peace Proposals, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1981, pp. 239–46.
Raymond Aron, Peace and War (New York: Doubleday, 1973) p. 364.
J. J. Holst, Five Roads to Nordic Security (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1973) pp. 113–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Ingemar Lindahl
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindahl, I. (1988). Introduction: Two Political Cultures. In: The Soviet Union and the Nordic Nuclear-Weapons-Free-Zone Proposal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09320-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09320-5_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09322-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09320-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)