Iron and Steel and Development in Turkey

Turkey Implements a Development Strategy
  • Joseph S. Szyliowicz
Part of the St Antony’s book series


Just as our understanding of technology and its potential have been oversimplified for decades, so have the difficulties that are inherent in the struggle to achieve modernity, a struggle that continues to be waged daily throughout the globe. At first, especially in the decades following World War II, it was naively expected that infusions of capital and technology would achieve the same results in what were then termed the ‘underdeveloped countries’ as the Marshall Plan had for Europe. That illusion was quickly dispelled as it became clear that Europe’s infrastructures of skills, technology, values and social systems were unique.


Blast Furnace Rolling Mill Coke Oven Steel Plant Import Substitution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hollis Chenery, Structural Change in Development Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp.26 ff.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For a recent analysis of the advantages of export promotion over the import substitution strategy, see J. N. Bhagwati, ‘Rethinking trade strategy’, in J. P. Lewis and V. Kallab (eds.), Development Strategies Reconsidered (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1986) pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OECD, The Impact of the Newly Industrializing Countries on Production and Trade in Manufacture (Paris: OECD, 1979), pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cited in J. D. Bryce, Industrial Development (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960), p. 3.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    A. O. Hirschman, The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1970), pp. 105–106;Google Scholar
  6. O. Grine, ‘Transfer of technology in the Arab steel industry’, in A. B. Zahlan (ed.), Technology Transfer and Change in the Arab World (New York: Pergamon, 1978), p. 453.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Unido, Draft World-Wide Study of the Iron and Steel Industry, 1975–2000 (UNIDO/CIS 25/15 December, 1976), p. 111.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    T. R. Howell, W. A. Noellert, J. G. Kreier and A. W. Wolff, Steel and the State (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1988), pp. 16 ff.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    The spread of these technologies is analyzed by George F. Ray, The Diffusion of Mature Technologies (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984),Google Scholar
  10. the differences in the speed with which the two countries adopted new technologies in Leonard H. Lynn, How Japan Innovates: A Comparison with the U.S. in the Case of Oxygen Steelmaking (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982). Lynn concludes that the Japanese innovated more rapidly than the USA because their companies had access to superior knowledge which came from the extensive and sophisticated mechanisms that they utilized to scan technological progress abroad and had the ability to use that knowledge to solve their problems.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    D. Barnett and R. Crandall, Up From the Ashes, (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1986).Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Unido, Industry in a Changing World (New York: Unido, 1983), p. 274, hereafter referred to as UNIDO ‘Industry’.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    I. Çelebi, Türkiye’de Demir Çelik Sanayiĭnĭn Yapĭsĭ ve Sorunlarĭ (Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, 1979), Tables 25, 26, pp. 74, 75.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    For a discussion of how policy-makers reacted to these changes see S. Woolcock, ‘The international politics of trade and production in the steel industry’, in J. Pinder (ed.), National Industrial Strategies and the World Economy (London: Croom Helm, 1982).Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    For a skeptical view of the Third World’s steel potential see B. Chateau and B. Lapillone, Energy Demand: Facts and Trends (New York: Springer Verlag, 1982), pp. 166–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 23.
    On economic policy under Ataturk, see Z. Y. Hershlag, Turkey: The Challenge of Growth (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1968l), p. 61–127.Google Scholar
  17. On these early efforts at planning see also E. Günce, ‘Early planning experiences in Turkey’, in S. Ilkin and E. Inanç, Planning in Turkey (Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 1967), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    These details are from S. S. Aydemir, Ikinci Adam (Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1968), cited in I. Çelebi, op. cit., pp. 48–9. See also Cumhuriyetin 50 Yĭlĭnda Türkiye Demir ve Çelik Işletmeleri (Ankara: TDÇI; Türkiye’de Modern Bir Demir Çelik Sanayii Kurmak Için Yapilan Ilk Çalismalar (Karabük Genel Müdürlüğü, n.d.), Mimeo, hereafter referred to as Karabük; and Hershlag, op. cit., pp. 103 ff.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    Bertil Walstedt, State Manufacturing Enterprises in Mixed Economies: The Turkish Case (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980), p. 74.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    In the early sixties at least 1.6 tons of ore, 0.65 tons of coke, 0.2 tons of limestone and 0.05 tons of iron and steel scrap and 4 tons of air were required to produce one ton of pig iron: W. Baer, The Development of the Brazilian Steel Industry (Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 1969) p. 11.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    T. G. A. Muntz, Turkey (New York: Philosophical Library 1950), p. 62;Google Scholar
  22. M. W. Thornburg, G. Spry and G. Soule, Turkey: An Economic Appraisal (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1949), p. 100.Google Scholar
  23. 41.
    I. S. Barutçugil, Türkiye’de Demir Çelik Endüstrisi (Istanbul: Bursa Universitesi Iktisadi ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakultesi, 1978), p. 96.Google Scholar
  24. 42.
    A sympathetic analyst considers this to be ‘the most valid charge levelled against it’: Morris Singer, The Economic Advance of Turkey, 1938–1960 (Ankara: Turkish Economic Society, 1977), p. 33.Google Scholar
  25. 43.
    IBRD, The Economy of Turkey (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1951), p. 117.Google Scholar
  26. 49.
    Ozay Mehmet, ‘Turkey in crisis: some contradictions in the Kemalist development strategy’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 15, 1983, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 50.
    Osman Okyar, Public International Development Financing in Turkey (New York: Columbia University School of Law Research Projects on Public International Development Financing, Report No. 3, 1962), pp. 4 ff.Google Scholar
  28. 54.
    Anne O. Krueger, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Turkey (New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1974), pp. 6. ff.Google Scholar
  29. 60.
    T. Tayanç, Sanayileşme Süresinde 50 Yil (Istanbul: Millyet Yayĭnlarĭ, 1973), p. 151.Google Scholar
  30. 63.
    Department of State, AID, Turkey: Ereğli Iron and Steel Works, Capital Assistance Paper AID/DLC/P567 (Washington, DC, 14 May 1967), p. 21; hereafter referred to as P567.Google Scholar
  31. 64.
    Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, First Five Year Development Plan (Ankara: State Planning Organization, 1963), p. 268. Hereafter referred to as First Plan.Google Scholar
  32. 66.
    T. Candir and A. Candir, ‘Türkiye Demir-Çelik Talep’ Tahminleri (Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, 1966), mimeo, p. 130.Google Scholar
  33. 67.
    Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, Second Five Year Development Plan, (Ankara: State Planning Organization, 1967) pp. 510–17.Google Scholar
  34. 68.
    Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, Third Five Year Development Plan, (Ankara: State Planning Organization, 1972) pp. 462 ff.Google Scholar
  35. 69.
    Devlet Planlama Teşkilatĭ, Fourth Five Year Development Plan, (Ankara: State Planning Organization, 1978) pp. 584.Google Scholar
  36. 70.
    On developments in this period and the structure of the polity, see C. H. Dodd, Democracy and Development in Turkey (Hull, UK: Eothen Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  37. 79.
    World Bank, Turkey: Policies and Prospects for Growth (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1980), pp. 1 ff.Google Scholar
  38. 82.
    J. D. Lewis and S. Unata, Turkey: Economic Performance and Medium Term Prospects, 1978–1990 (Washington, DC: World Bank Staff Working Paper, 1982), pp. 12 ff.Google Scholar
  39. 84.
    Merih Celasun, Sources of Industrial Growth and Structural Change: The Case of Turkey (Washington, DC: World Bank Staff Working Paper. 614, 1983), p. 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Joseph S. Szyliowicz 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph S. Szyliowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Greenwood VillageUSA

Personalised recommendations