Abstract
Although the history play is a most popular genre among English playwrights of this century very little research has been done in the field. In particular, because it is a large and difficult subject, critics have generally tended to shirk any attempt to define the scope and the limits of the genre. Such attempts at definition as have been made are mainly based on Elizabethan playwrights and practice, and very little work has been done along these lines in relation to the twentieth century. The term ‘history play’ has often been used rather loosely and in the twentieth century the existence of such a genre has not been clearly defined or sufficiently elucidated. Various preconceptions surround the term so that our understanding of its meaning is, at best, hazy. It therefore must be critically rewarding to examine it afresh, seeking to define more precisely the scope and limits of the genre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acton, The Cambridge Modern History: an Account of its Origin, Authorship and Production (Cambridge University Press, 1907) pp. 10–2.
See G. Clark in G. R. Potter (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 1957) p. xxv.
Cited in St. John Ervine, Bernard Shaw, His Life, Work and Friends (London: Constable, 1956) pp. 499–500.
E. H. Erikson, Young Man Luther (London: Faber & Faber, 1959) p. 34.
Theodore Rozdak, Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics and Transcendence in Post-industrial Society (London: Faber & Faber, 1972) pp. 133–4.
B. Croce, History as the Story of Liberty (London: Allen & Unwin, 1938) p. 19.
In James Walter McFarlane and Graham Orton (eds. and trans.), The Oxford Ibsen (London: Oxford University Press, 1963) p. 603.
See A. B. Harbage, As They Liked It: An Essay on Shakespeare and Morality (New York: Macmillan, 1947) pp. 123–4;
L. Campbell, Shakespeare’s ‘Histories’: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy (San Marino: Huntingdon Library, 1947) p. 17.
S. H. Butcher, Aristotle’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Art: With a Critical Text and Translation of ‘The Poetics’ (New York: Dover Publications, 1894) pp. 35–7.
Albert Feuillerat (ed.), The Prose Works of Sir Phillip Sidney, vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, 1962) pp. 5–17.
Martin Meisel, Shaw and the Nineteenth-Century Theater (Princeton University Press, 1963) p. 353.
See E. Martin Browne, ‘The Two Beckets’, Drama, no. 60 (Spring 1961) p. 28.
Frederick Jackson Turner, ‘An American Definition of History’ in Fritz Stern (ed.), The Varieties of History: from Voltaire to the Present (Cleveland and New York: The World Publishing Co., 1956) p. 201.
See W. H. Prescott, History of the Conquest of Peru: with a Preliminary View of the Civilisation of the Incas (London: Allen & Unwin, 1847) p. ix.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Niloufer Harben
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harben, N. (1988). Introduction: The English History Play in the Twentieth Century. In: Twentieth-Century English History Plays. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09007-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09007-5_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-09009-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09007-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)