Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Economists, the Corn Laws and Commercial Policy

  • Chapter
Foreign Trade and the National Economy

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The repeal of the English Corn Laws on 26 June 1846 was an epoch-making event in the history of international economic policy. The decision was significant, perhaps more because of its symbolic value than for any dramatic impact on international economic relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Thweatt, op. cit. p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William D. Grampp, ‘Economic Opinion when Britain turned to Free Trade’, History of Political Economy, vol. 14, no. 4 (1982) p. 508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sir James Graham, M.P., Corn and Currency: in an Address to the Landowners (London: Ridgway, 1826) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The attitude of one of these landowners, Lord Sheffield: ‘I know nothing of Ricardo, nor of Hume, nor of any of the other writers, nor of their works’ was fairly typical. Remark quoted in Boyd Hilton, Corn, Cash and Commerce: The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments, 1815–1830 (Oxford: Oxford U.P., 1977) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. J. Stigler, ‘Do Economists Matter?’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 42, no. 3 (Jan 1976) pp. 347–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement (London: Longmans, 1959) p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (London: Faber & Faber, 1984) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cobbett’s Political Register, issues for November and December 1807.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Mill’s review of Spence’s pamphlet in Eclectic Review 3 (Dec 1807) p. 1056 and Commerce Defended in D. Winch (ed.) James Mill: Selected Economic Writings (Edinburgh, 1966) pp. 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See J. S. Chipman, ‘Balance of Payments Theory’, in J. Creedy and D. P. O’Brien (eds) Economic Analysis in Historical Perspective (London: Butterworths, 1984) pp. 209–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torrens, The Economists Refuted, pp. 15–26, 30–1, 50–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spiegel, op. cit. p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leonard Horner (ed.) Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Horner, M.P. 2 vols. (London, 1843) vol. II, p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malthus, Essay on Population, 5th ed. pp. 408–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid. pp. 426–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malthus, Essay on Population, 2nd ed., p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Idem. 3rd ed. (1806) vol. II, p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The full title of Ricardo’s pamphlet is An Essay on the Influence of a low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock; shewing the Inexpediency of Restrictions on Importations: with Remarks on Mr Malthus’s two last Publications

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hollander’s interpretation is contained in his The Economics of David Ricardo, op. cit. pp. 599–642, and ‘Ricardo and the Corn Laws: A Revision’, History of Political Economy, vol. 9, no. 1 (Spring 1977) pp. 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. For the traditional view that Ricardo’s profit theory originated in concern over the Corn Laws see Blaug, Ricardian Economics: A Historical Study (New Haven, Conn.: Yale U.P. 1958) pp. 31–2;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maurice Dobb, Theories of Production and Distribution Since Adam Smith (Cambridg U.P., 1973) pp. 89–90;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. D. P. O’Brien, J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics (London, 1970) p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ricardo, Works, vol. VI, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. L. Meek, ‘The Decline of Ricardian Economics in England’, Economica, vol. 17 (1950) p. 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. See Anthony Arblaster, The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984) p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Edwin Cannan, History of the Theories of Production and Distribution in English Political Economy from 1776 to 1848, 3rd ed. (London: Staples Press, 1953) p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ricardo, Works, vol. IV, p. 26 n.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid. vol. VI, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid. vol. IV, p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid. vol. IV, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ‘Mr Owen’s Plans for Relieving the National Distress’, Edinburgh Review, 32 (Oct 1819) p. 459. All articles in the Edinburgh were unsigned, but the work has been attributed to Torrens although McCulloch is sometimes mentioned as being the author.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Torrens, Essay on the Production of Wealth (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown, 1821) pp. 252–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid. p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Torrens, Essay Upon the External Corn Trade, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid. p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid. p. 235, 331–2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Torrens, Tracts on Trade and Finance, no. II (London, 1852) pp. 48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eclectic Review, n.s. 2 (July 1814) pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Andrea Maneschi, ‘Dynamic Aspects of Ricardo’s International Trade Theory’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 35, no. 1 (Mar 1983) p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See also the article by Vivian Walsh, ‘Ricardian Foreign Trade Theory in the Light of the Classical Revival’, Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 5, no. 3 (Oct 1979) pp. 421–7

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ricardo, Works, vol. I, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hollander, Economics of Ricardo, op. cit. p. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. P. O’Brien, ‘Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 33, no. 3 (Nov 1981) p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blaug, Ricardian Economics, op. cit. pp. 31–2. Joan Robinson said: ‘He used it as a horror story.’ Robinson, op. cit. vol. V, p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  45. For a critique of Berg’s interpretation see the review of her book by Gregory Claeys and Prue Kerr, ‘Mechanical Political Economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 5 (1981) pp. 251–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. O’Brien, ‘Ricardian Economics …’ (1981) op. cit. p. 381.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid. p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blaug, Ricardian Economics, op. cit. p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ricardo, Works, vol. V, pp. 187–8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid. vol. IV, p. 243. See also idem, Ricardo to McCulloch (Mar 1821) vol. VIII, pp. 355–60.

    Google Scholar 

  51. William D. Grampp, ‘Economic Opinion and Free Trade’, op. cit. p. 510.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ricardo, Works, vol. VIII, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid. vol. I, p. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid. p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See the interesting paper by William Grampp, ‘Scots, Jews, and Subversives among the Dismal Scientists’, Journal of Economic History vol. 36, no. 3 (Sep 1976) pp. 543–71, on the lampooning of the classical economists at the hands of popular, xenophobic writers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ricardo, Works, vol. I, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. M. Letiche, ‘Adam Smith and David Ricardo on Economic Growth’, in Bert F. Hoselitz, J. J. Spengler et al., Theories of Economic Growth (Glenco, Ill.: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960) p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ricardo, Works, vol. I, pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. S. Mill commented on the issue in two articles for the Westminster Review — ‘The Corn Laws’, Apr 1825 and ‘The New Corn Law’, January 1827 reprinted in Collected Works, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mill, Collected Works, op. cit. vol. IV, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid. p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid. p. 143. For an excellent account of the arguments used in the parliamentary debates on the Corn Laws during 1824–30 see Barry Gordon, Economic Doctrine and Tory Liberalism 1824–30 (London, Macmillan: 1979) pp. 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Melvyn Krauss, The New Protectionism (New York, 1979) p. XXIII, also p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) 1: col. 673 (30 May 1820).

    Google Scholar 

  65. See the reference in Grampp, ‘Scots, Jews, and Subversives’, op. cit. p. 565.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Annual Register, 1820 (London, 1822) vol. I, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  67. For a revealing discussion of the analytical issues and personalities involved in the Australian case for protection see the exchanges between Paul A. Samuelson and Gary J. Manger in Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 96, no. 1 (Feb 1981) pp. 147–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Torrens, Tracts on Finance and Trade, vol II (London: Chapman & Hall, 1852) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Malthus, Essay on Population, 5th ed. ii, pp. 409–10.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid. pp. 403–4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ricardo to Malthus, 16 Sep 1814, Works, vol. VI, p. 134, and

    Google Scholar 

  72. Works, vol. VIII, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  73. J. C. L. Simonde de Sismondi, Nouveau Principes d’Economie politique (1819) (Paris: Caiman-Levy, 1971 pp. 265–6.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jean-Baptiste Say, Letter to Mr Malthus on Several Subjects of Political Economy, and on the Cause of the Stagnation of Commerce, trans. John Richter (London: Sherwood, Neely & Jones, 1821) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Robinson, op. cit. vol. I, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Chipman, op. cit. pp. 711 and 713. Part 2 The Neo-Classical Theory’.

    Google Scholar 

  77. R. Torrens, A Letter to the Right Honourable Lord John Russell, (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, 1837) p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Malthus, Principles of Political Economy (London: John Murray, 1820) p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Sir W. Sleeman, On Taxes, or Public Revenue (London: Elder & Co., 1829) p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  80. G. Poulett Scrope, Principles of Political Economy (London: Longman, Rees, 1833) pp. 378–82.

    Google Scholar 

  81. G. Poulett Scrope, ‘The Political Economists’, Quarterly Review, vol. 44 (1831) p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Arthur I. Bloomfield, ‘Effect of Growth on the Terms of Trade: Some Earlier Views’, Economica, vol. 51 (May 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Torrens, Letter to Lord John Russell, op. cit. pp. 132–3.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Frank Whitson Fetter, ‘Robbins on Torrens’, Economica (Nov 1958) p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  85. For Senior’s criticism see his article ‘Free Trade and Retaliation’, Edinburgh Review, vol. LXXVIII (July 1843) pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ibid. p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  87. McCulloch’s critique is to be found on pp. 166–8 of the 1849 ed. of his Principles.

    Google Scholar 

  88. McCulloch, Principles (1849) p. 166 and pp. 151–2. O’Brien’s comments are in J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics, op. cit. pp. 227–8.

    Google Scholar 

  89. For a good discussion of the controversy between Senior and Torrens, see Marian Bowley, op. cit. pp. 225–8.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Torrens, The Budget, op. cit. pp. 177 and 66.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Torrens, A Letter to Lord John Russell, op. cit. p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Colonel Torrens, Speech in the House of Commons on the Motion for a Reappointment of a Select Committee on Emigration, February 15 1827 (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green, 1828).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Quoted in S. A. Meenai, ‘Robert Torrens 1780–1864’, Economica (Feb 1956) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  94. R. Davis, The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade (Leicester: Leicester U.P., 1979) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  95. John Craig, Remarks on Some Fundamental Doctrines of Political Economy (Edinburgh, 1821) pp. 101–2.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Hansard, n.s. 18 (1828) cols 1553–5.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Torrens’s speech 15 Feb 1827 quoted in F. W. Fetter, op. cit. p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  98. On colonisation schemes and the economists’ involvement in the debate, see R. N. Ghosh, Classical Macroeconomics and the Case for Colonies (Calcutta: New Age, 1967) pp. 25–38 and 228–45.

    Google Scholar 

  99. J. S. Mill, Collected Works, op. cit. vol. IV, p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibid. p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ibid. p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ibid. p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ibid. p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  104. J. S. Mill, Principles (1852) 5th ed. vol II, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Mill, Principles (W. J. Ashley ed.) p. 739.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Mill, Some Unsettled Questions, op. cit. p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Donald N. McCloskey, ‘Magnanimous Albion: Free Trade and British National Income, 1841–1881’, Explorations in Economic History, vol. 17 (1980) pp. 303–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. See also criticisms of McCloskey by P. J. Nain in Explorations in Economic History, vol. 19, pp. 201–7, and McCloskey’s reply, ibid. pp. 208–10.

    Google Scholar 

  109. See C. P. Kindleberger, Comparative Studies in Trade, Finance and Growth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P. 1978) p. 53.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  110. Torrens, An Essay on the Production of Wealth (1821) pp. 288–9.

    Google Scholar 

  111. W. Sombart, Die deutsche Volkswirtschaft im neunzehnten Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1913) ch. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Hansard, n.s. 12 (1825) col. 1213. When the U.S. Congress increased tariffs sharply in 1828 Huskisson called for retaliation. See Hansard, n.s. 19 (1828) cols 1768–70.

    Google Scholar 

  113. J. H. Clapham, An Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 1 (Cambridge U.P., 1939) p. 479.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lord Welby, Cobden’s Work and Opinions, p. 18, quoted in J. A. Hobson, Richard Cobden: The International Man (London, 1919) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan vol. I, pp. 422–3.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Hamilton’s argument was presented in his Report on the Subject of Manufactures (1791) and

    Google Scholar 

  117. List’s in The National System of Political Economy (1841) (London: Longman, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  118. See A. Emmanuel, Profit and Crises (London: Heinemann, 1984) p. 3 n. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis, op. cit. p. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Mill, Principles (W. J. Ashley ed.) (London: Longmans Green, 1909) p. 922.

    Google Scholar 

  121. M. C. Kemp, ‘The Mill-Bastable Infant-Industry Dogma’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 68 (Feb 1960), pp. 65–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Cobden Club Pamphlet, John Stuart Mill on the Protection of Infant Industries (London, 1911) pp. 11, 13–15, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  123. See also J. S. Mill, Collected Works, vol. 16, ed. F. E. Mineka and D. W. Lindley (Toronto U.P., 1972) pp. 1043–4, 1150–1, 1419–20 and 1520–1.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Harry Johnson, ‘A New View of the Infant Industry Argument’, in I. A. McDougall and Richard H. Snape (eds) Studies in International Economics: Monash Conference Papers (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970) p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Mill, Principles (1848) (W. J. Ashley ed.) p. 581.

    Google Scholar 

  126. For a good summary of writings on this and other nineteenth-century issues about trade, technology and growth see Arthur I. Bloomfield, ‘The Impact of Growth and Technology on Trade in Nineteenth-century British Thought’, History of Political Economy, vol. 10, no. 4 (1978) pp. 608–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Ricardo, Works, vol. V, pp. 302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ibid. vol. I, pp. 396–7.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Ibid. vol. V, p. XX.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Hansard, n.s. 13 (1825) col. 1233.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Malthus, Additions to the Fourth and Former Editions of Essay on Population (London: John Murray, 1817) p. 108;

    Google Scholar 

  132. J. R. McCulloch, On Commerce (London, 1833) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  133. William Playfair, An Inquiry into the Permanent Causes of the Decline and Fall of Powerful and Wealthy Nations (London, 1805) pp. 212, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Second Series, vol. XVI, (6 Dec 1826) cols 294–5. Alexander Baring (the banker), who introduced Torrens to the House, congratulated him afterwards on his speech: ‘It had been for so long a time the habit to look upon any man as a Goth who dissented from the modern doctrine of political economy’, that it was indeed a pleasure to welcome Torrens to the House. Ibid. col. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Third Series, vol. xxiv, 2 July 1834, col. 1088; vol. XXV, (2 Aug 1834) col. 908.

    Google Scholar 

  136. F. W. Fetter, ‘Robert Torrens: Colonel of Marines and Political Economist’, Economica (May 1962) p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Nassau Senior, Three Lectures on the Cost of Obtaining Money and Some Effects of Private and Government Paper Money (1830) op. cit. pp. 25–6, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Lord King’s Speech, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) n.s. vol. xxiii (29 Mar 1830) cols 969–70, 969–70, 973–4.

    Google Scholar 

  139. For McCulloch’s and Malthus’s testimony before the Committee see Select Committee on Combination Laws, Artisans and Machinery, Parliamentary Papers (1824) vol. V, cols, 592, 596 and 598.

    Google Scholar 

  140. H. R. C. Wright, Free Trade and Protection in the Netherlands, 1816–39; A Study of the First Benelux (Cambridge U.P., 1955) p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Report of the Select Committee on the Laws Relating to the Export of Tools and Machinery (30 June 1825) no. 504, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  142. J. Kennedy, On the Exportation of Machinery (London, 1824) p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  143. J. S. Mill, ‘Of the Laws of Interchange Between Nations’ in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions (London: John Parker, 1844) op. cit. pp. 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  144. ‘Exportation of Machinery’, Westminster Review, III (Apr 1825) pp. 386–94.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Mill, op. cit. p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Parliamentary Papers (1841) vol. VII. Testimony of Holland Hooke, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  147. P. J. Cain, Economic Foundations of British Overseas Expansion 1815–1914 (London: Macmillan, 1980) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  148. For a detailed account of the restrictions and the role of Manchester manufacturers see A. E. Musson, ’The “Manchester School” and Exportation of Machinery’, Business History (Jan 1972) pp. 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middlesex Polytechnic, London, UK

    Leonard Gomes (Senior Lecturer in Economics)

Authors
  1. Leonard Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1987 Leonard Gomes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomes, L. (1987). The Economists, the Corn Laws and Commercial Policy. In: Foreign Trade and the National Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08992-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation