Skip to main content

Measuring Individual Differences by Cross-Modality Comparison

  • Chapter
The Perception of Exertion in Physical Work

Part of the book series: Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series ((WGS))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

Many of the problems that face physiologists and psychologists who study perceived exertion are rather general ones of psychophysical measurement. Often it is important or necessary to ask such questions as, What intensity level of perceived exertion does a person experience at a given moment? How does the perception of exertion change over time? How does it change with increase in workload?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartoshuk, L.M. (1979). Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. Science, 205, 934–935.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1961). Interindividual scaling and perception of muscular force. Kung. Fysiogr. Sails. Lund Förh., 31, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1972). A ratio scaling method for interindividual comparisons. Rep. Inst. Appl. Psychol., Univ. Stockh., No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G., Ljunggren, G., and Marks, L.E. (1985). General and differential aspects of perceived exertion and loudness assessed by two new methods. Rep. Dept. Psychol., Univ. Stockh., No. 636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. (1967). Genetics and gustatory chemoreception in man and other primates. In The Chemical Senses and Nutrition.(eds. M. Kare and O. Mailer). Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E. (1978). The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations among the Modalities. Academic Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E., Borg, G., and Ljunggren, G. (1983). Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods. Percept. Psychophys., 34, 280–288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E., Stevens, J.C., and Stone, V. (in preparation). Magnitude matching of taste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.E., Szczesiul, R., and Ohlott, P.J. (in preparation). On the cross-modal perception of intensity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.C., and Marks, L.E. (1980). Cross-modality matching functions generated by the method of magnitude estimation. Percept. Psychophys., 27, 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalmann, R. (1965). Cross-modality matching in the study of abnormal loudness functions. Laryngoscope, 75, 1708–1726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L.M. (1982). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties. Percept. Psychophys., 31, 53–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 The Wenner-Gren Center

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marks, L.E. (1986). Measuring Individual Differences by Cross-Modality Comparison. In: Borg, G., Ottoson, D. (eds) The Perception of Exertion in Physical Work. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08946-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics