Advertisement

Obstacles to Doing More with Less: Illustrations from the Kansas Experience

  • Kim S. Hunt
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)

Abstract

State budgeting reforms are often instituted with a strong desire to improve the productivity of state government. This article examines the connections between productivity and budgeting reforms. A decision-making framework is developed with which to suggest potential obstacles to successful implementation of budget reforms. Using examples from the Kansas experience, these obstacles are systematically examined.

Keywords

Comprehensive Rationality National Governor Expenditure Plan Legislative Branch Agency Personnel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, G. T. (1971), Essence of decision (Boston: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  2. Bachrach, P. and M. S. Baratz (1970), Power and poverty: Theory and practice ( New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Bahl, R. W. and J. Burkhead (1977), ‘Productivity and the measurement of public output’, in C. Levine (ed.) Managing Human Resources: A Challenge to Urban Government (Beverly Hills, California: Sage ), pp. 253–69.Google Scholar
  4. Bozeman, B. and J. D. Straussman (1982), ‘Shrinking budgets and shrinkage of budgetary theory’, Public Administration Review, 42, pp. 509–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braybrooke, D. and C. E. Lindblom (1963), A strategy of decision ( Glencoe, IL: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  6. Caiden, N. (1981), ‘Public budgeting amidst uncertainty and instability’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 1, pp. 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caiden, N. (1984), ‘The new rules of the federal budget game’, Public Administration Review, 44, pp. 109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cyert, R. and J. March (1963), A behavioral theory of the firm ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  9. Forester, J. (1984), ‘Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through’, Public Administration Review, 44, pp. 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg, G. D., J. S. Miller, L. B. Mohr and B. C. Vladeck (1977), ‘Developing public policy theory: Perspectives from empirical research’, American Political Science Review, 71, pp. 1532–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulick, L. and L. Urwick (eds) (1937), Papers on the science of administration ( New York: Institute of Public Administration ).Google Scholar
  12. Harkin, J. M. (1982), ‘Effectiveness budgeting: The limits of budget reform’, Policy Studies Review, 2, pp. 112–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindblom, C. (1959), ‘The science of muddling through’, Public Administration Review, 19, pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. March, J. G. and and H. A. Simon (1958), Organizations (New York: J. Wiley).Google Scholar
  15. Muchmore, L. and H. Duncan (1982), The Kansas budget process: Concept and practice (Topeka, Kansas: Capital Complex Center).Google Scholar
  16. Nagel, S. S. (1984), Public policy: Goals, means, and methods ( New York: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  17. National Governors’ Association, Office of Research and Development ( 1983; June), Fiscal survey of the states 1983 ( Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association ).Google Scholar
  18. Rein, M. (1976), Social science and public policy ( New York: Pengu in Books).Google Scholar
  19. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960), The semisovereign people ( Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press).Google Scholar
  20. Schick, A. and H. Harry (1982), ‘Zero base budgeting: The manager’s budget’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 2, pp. 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon, H. A. (1975), Administrative behaviour ( New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  22. Swiss, J. E. (1983), ‘Establishing a management system: The interaction of power shifts and personality under federal MBO’, Public Administration Review, 43, pp. 238–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wildaysky, A. (1966), ‘The political economy of efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting’, Public Administration Review, 26, pp. 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wildaysky, A. (1975), The politics of the budgetary process (Boston: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  25. Wildaysky, A. (1979), Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis (Boston: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  26. Wilson, W. (1887), ‘The study of administration’, Political Science Quarterly, 2, pp. 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim S. Hunt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations