Implementing National Innovation Policies Through Private Decisionmaking

  • Alden S. Bean
  • Norman R. Baker
Part of the Policy Studies Organization Series book series (PSOS)

Abstract

It is clear that the national debate of the 1970s concerning the proper role of the federal government in industrial innovation has abated, at least for now. Current policy favours direct government support of basic research and of very large-scale, high-risk development projects, such as fusion power. It embraces applied research, development and technological innovation as essential elements of economic growth and development, but rejects an enhanced federal presence. Instead, it provides additional incentives for industrial R & D and innovation, and looks to the marketplace for the events and forces which will shape and focus industrial R & D programmes and their commercial applications. Some of the elements of this policy were questioned and disputed by public interest groups. Coping with these disputed issues will increase the complexity of the already difficult task that is entrusted to the nation’s industrial R & D executives and their management colleagues. The purpose of this chapter is to review possible sources of conflict between the role R & D management has in serving the economic needs of the corporation and its role in implementing innovation policy in the public interest.

Keywords

Income Marketing Assure Expense Conglomerate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antitrust Guide Concerning Research Joint Ventures (1980) Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, W. O. (1979) ‘Recent Federal Science Policies’, in National Science and Technology Policy Issues 1979, Part I, A Compendium of Papers. 96th Congress, first session. Washington, DC: Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, A. S. and N. R. Baker (1983) ‘Industrial R & D Management in the 80’s, Part II: Strategic Challenges and Public Policy’, Operations Management Review, 1 (2) 11–16.Google Scholar
  4. Hanley, J. W. (1981) ‘Monsanto’s Early Warning System’, Harvard Business Review (November-December), 101–102.Google Scholar
  5. Hayes, R.H. and W.J. Abernathy (1980) ‘Managing Our Way to Economic Decline’, Harvard Business Review (July-August), 66–77.Google Scholar
  6. Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Schaeffer, R. and A. R. Janger (1982) ‘Who is Top Management?’, Report no. 821. Washington, DC: The Conference Board.Google Scholar
  8. Scherer, F. M. (1982) ‘Inter-Industry Technology flows in the United States’, Research Policy, 11, 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scherer, F. M. (1983) ‘R & D and Declining Productivity Growth’. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 72 (2), 215–18.Google Scholar
  10. US Department of Commerce (1979) Final Report, Advisory Committee on Industrial Innovation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. US NSF (1980) Science and Technology: Annual Report to the Congress. Washington, DC: National Science Board.Google Scholar
  12. US NSF (1981) Science Indicators 1980. Washington, DC: National Science Board.Google Scholar
  13. US NSF (1982) Tax Policy and Innovation: A Synthesis of the Evidence, Research Report no. 82–1. Washington, DC: Division of Policy Research and Analysis.Google Scholar
  14. US OMB, Executive Office of the President (1982) Special Analysis K, Research and Development, The Budget of the United States Government, 1983. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Policy Studies Organization 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alden S. Bean
  • Norman R. Baker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations