Skip to main content
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

In the last ten years there have been a number of placebo-controlled studies of penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis. All of these show it to be better than placebo.

Prospective controlled studies and uncontrolled evaluations of the drug in clinical practice show that it reduces the degree of acute synovial inflammation, reduces the elevated ESR of active disease, and also lowers other acute-phase changes. It has more debatable effects on immunological abnormalities and other variables such as glutathione and sulphydryl levels, but these all show some evidence of improvement. There is little direct evidence that it reduces the chronic progressive joint destruction of rheumatoid synovitis, which can be measured radiologically. It often causes adverse reactions, is often ineffective, and although it improves many variables these do not often return completely to normal. There is minimal evidence that it actually changes the long-term outcome in rheumatoid disease.

Interpretation of the studies indicates that penicillamine is a useful antirheumatic drug. The question is how to improve upon therapy. There are several methods open, including the use of combinations of second-line drugs, or starting treatment with drugs like penicillamine very early in the course of the disease. Will further placebo-controlled trials help resolve these questions or do we need another type of approach? As all the traditional studies have a very high dropout rate their conclusions have certain limitations and there is a need for a different type of study. The value of the traditional approach to testing drugs like penicillamine is clearly very limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lyle, W. H. ‘Penicillamine’, in Huskisson, E. C. (ed.) Antirheumatic Drugs ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1983 ) 521–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. Modulation of Auto-immunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, F. H. F., ‘Penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis’, in Hill, A. G. S. (ed.) Topical Reviews in Rheumatic Disorders, Vol I ( Bristol: Wright, 1980 ) 78–109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunneyball, I. M. ‘Recent developments in disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs’, Prog. Drug. Res. 24 (1980) 101–216.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crawhall, J. C. ‘Penicillamine: twenty-five years later’, Ann. Intern. Med. 93 (1980) 367–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright, V. and Amos, R. ‘Do drugs change the course of rheumatoid arthritis?’, Br. Med. J. 280 (1980) 964–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunch, T. W., O’Duffy, J. D. ‘Disease modifying drugs for progressive rheumatoid arthritis’, Mayo Clin. Proc. 55 (1980) 161–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Penicillamine-the therapeutic paradox’, Lancet, ii (1981) 1209–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaffe, I. A. ‘Intra-articular dissociation of the rheumatoid factor’, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 60 (1962) 409–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jaffe, I. A. ‘The effect of penicillamine on the laboratory parameters in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 8 (1965) 1064–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miehike, K. and Kohlardt, I. ‘Über die immuno-depressionische Wirkung von D-penicillamin in der behandlung der progredientchronischen polyarthritis’, Rheumaforschung 26 (1967) 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Golding, J. R., Wilson, J. V. and Plunkett, T. G. ‘Laboratory observations on the dose of penicillamine in rheumatoid disease’, Postgrad. Med. J. October Supplement (1968) 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Multicentre Trial Group, ‘Controlled trial of D-penicillamine in severe rheumatoid arthritis’, Lancet, 1 (1973) 275–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dixon, A. St J., Davies, J., Dormandy, T. L. et al. ‘Synthetic D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 34 (1975) 416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mery, L., Deirieu, F., Ghozlan, R. et al. ‘Controlled trial of D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis’, Scand. J. Rheumatol. 5 (1976) 241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiokawa, Y., Horiuchi, Y., Honma, M., Kageyama, T., Okada, T. and Azuma, T. ‘Clinical evaluation of D-penicillamine by multicentric double-blind comparative study in chronic rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 20 (1977) 1464–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson, T., Huskisson, E. C., Wojtulewski, J. A. et al. ‘Evidence that D-penicillamine alters the course of rheumatoid arthritis’, Rheumatol. Rehab. 15 (1976) 211–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, H. J., Ward, J. R., Reading, J. C. et al. ‘Low-dose D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 26 (1983) 581–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nissila, M., Nuotio, P., von Essen, R. and Makisara, P. ‘Low-dose penicillamine treatment of RA. Comparison of 600 mg and 300 mg regimens’, Scand. J. Rheumatol. 11 (1982) 162–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McConkey, B., Crockson, R. A. and Crockson, A. P. ‘The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. A study based on measurements of serum acute-phase reactants’, Quart. J. Med. 41 (1972) 115–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McConkey, B., Crockson, R. A., Crockson, A. P. and Wilkinson, A. R. ‘The effect of some anti-inflammatory drugs on the acute-phase proteins in rheumatoid arthritis’, Quart. J. Med. 42 (1973) 785–91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ritchie, D. M., Boyle, J. A., McInnes, J. M. et al. ‘Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, Quart. J. Med. 37 (1968) 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farr, M., Scott, D. L., Constable, T. J., Hawker, R. J., Hawkins, C. F. and Penicillamine 53

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stuart, J. ‘Thrombocytosis of active rheumatoid disease’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 42 (1983) 545–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kendall, M. J., Cockel, R., Becker, J. and Hawkins, C. F. ‘Raised serum alkaline phosphatase in rheumatoid disease’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 29 (1970) 537–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dixon, J. S., Bird, H. A., Pickup, M. E. and Wright, V. ‘A human model screening system for the detection of specific antirheumatic activity’, Sem. Arthritis Rheum. 12 (1982) 185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall, N. D., Blake, D. R. and Bacon, P. A. ‘The significance of serum sulphydryl measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with D-penicillamine’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Autoimmunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pickup, M. E., Dixon, J. S. and Bird, H. A. ‘On the effects of antirheumatic drugs on protein sulphydryl reactivity in human serum’, J. Ph arm. Pharmacol. 32(1980)301–2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Steinbrocker, D., Traeger, C. H. and Batterman, R. C. ‘Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis’, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 140 (1949) 659–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Larsen, A. ‘Radiological grading of rheumatoid arthritis: an inter-observer study’, Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2 (1973) 136–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Amos, R. S., Constable, T. J., Crockson, R. A., Crockson, A. P. and McConkey, B. ‘Rheumatoid arthritis: relation of serum C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate to radiographic changes’, Br. Med. J. i (1978) 195–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sharp, J. T., Lidsky, M. D., Collins, L. C. and Moreland, J. ‘Methods of scoring the progression of radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 14 (1971) 706–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Buckland-Wright, J. C. ‘X-ray assessment of activity in rheumatoid disease’, Br. J. Rheumatol. 22 (1983) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mewa, A. A. M., Pui, M., Cockshott, W. P. and Buchanan, W. W. ‘Observer differences in detecting erosions in radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis’, J. Rheumatol. 10 (1983) 216–21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See note 29.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cooperating Clinics Committee of the American Rheumatism Association, ‘A controlled trial of gold salt therapy in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 16 (1973) 353–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sigler, J. W., Bluhm, G. B., Duncan, H., Sharp, J. T., Ensign, D. C. and McCrum, W. R. ‘Gold salts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind study’, Ann. Intern. Med. 80 (1974) 21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooperating Clinics Committee of the American Rheumatism Association, ‘A controlled trial of cyclophosphamide in rheumatoid arthritis’, New Engl. J. Med. 283 (1970) 883–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. See note 17.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grindulis, K. A., Scott, D. L. and Struthers, G. R. ‘The assessment of radiological progression in the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis’, Rheumatol. Int. 3 (1983) 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott, D. L., Grindulis, K. A., Struthers, G. R., Coulton, B. L., Popert, A. J. and Bacon, P. A. ‘The progression of radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 43 (1984) 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott, D. L., Bacon, P. A., Fower, P. D., Dawes, P. and Grindulis, K. A. ‘Slow acting antirheumatic drugs and X-ray progression in rheumatoid arthritis’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  43. See note 10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bacon, P. A., Blake, D. R., Alexander, G. J. M. and Hall, N. D. ‘Alterations in immunological parameters associated with D-penicillamine therapy’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Auto-immunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wernick, R., Merryman, P., Jaffe, I. and Ziff, M. ‘IgG and IgM rheumatoid factors in rheumatoid arthritis: quantitative response to penicillamine therapy and relationship to disease activity’, Arthritis Rheum. 26 (1983) 593–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Scott, D. G. I., Bacon, P. A., Allen, C., Elson, C. J. and Wallington, T. ‘IgG rheumatoid factor, complement and immune complexes in rheumatoid synovitis and vasculitis: comparative and serial studies during cytotoxic therapy’, Clin. Exp. Immunol. 43 (1981) 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fernandes, L., Vergani, D., Davies, E., Berry, H., Hamilton, E. B. D. and Tee, D. ‘D-penicillamine nephropathy, circulating immune complexes and auto-antibodies’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Autoimmunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wollheim, F. A., Jeppsson, J. D. and Laurell, C. B. ‘D-penicillamine treatment in rheumatoid arthritis monitored by plasma a-l-antitrypsin-IgA complexes and plasma and urinary’sulphur containing amino acids’, Scand. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 28 (1979) 21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mohammed, I., Barraclough, D., Holborow, E. J. and Ansell, B. M. ‘Effects of penicillamine therapy on circulating immune complexes in rheumatoid arthritis’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 35 (1976) 458–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lipsky, P. E. and Ziff, M. ‘The effect of D-penicillamine on mitogen-induced human lymphocyte proliferation: synergistic inhibition by D-penicillamine and copper salts’, J. Immunol. 120 (1978) 1006–13.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lipsky, P. E. ‘The effect of D-penicillamine on human helper T cell function’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Auto-immunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Binderup, L., Braram, E. and Arrigoni-Martelli, E. ‘Immunological effects of D-penicillamine during experimentally induced inflammation in rats’, Scand. J. Immunol. 12 (1980) 239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rothermich, N. O., Thomas, M. H., Phillips, V. K. and Bregen, W. ‘Clinical trial of penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Rheum. 24 (1982) 1473–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Golding, J. R., Hickling, P., Martin, M. F. R. et al. ‘Low-dose penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis: seven years’ experience–a preliminary report’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Auto-immunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 173–7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. See note 53.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See note 54.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See note 53.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pullar, T., Hunter, J. A. and Capell, H. A. ‘Gold and penicillamine therapy: Is shared care with general practitioners effective and safe?’, Rheumatol. Rehab. 21 (1982) 139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kay, A. G. L. ‘Myelotoxicity of D-penicillamine’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 38 (1979) 232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. See note 23.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See note 54.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dische, F. E., Swinson, D. R., Hamilton, E. D. and Parons, V. ‘Immunopathology of penicillamine induced glomerular disease’, J. Rheumatol. 3 (1976) 145–54.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bacon, P. A., Tribe, C. R., Mackenzie, J. C., Jones, J. V., Cumming, R. H. and Amer, B. ‘Penicillamine nephropathy in rheumatoid arthritis’, Quart. J. Med. 45 (1976) 661–84.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Scott, D. L., Bradby, G. V. H., Aitman, T. J., Zaphiropoulos, G. C. and Hawkins, C. F. ‘Relationship of gold and penicillamine therapy to diffuse interstitial lung disease’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 40 (1981) 136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Geddes, D. M., Corrin, B., Brewerton, D. A., Davies, R. J. and Turner-Warwick, M. ‘Progressive airways obliteration in adults and its association with rheumatoid disease’, Quart. J. Med. 46 (1977) 427–44.

    Google Scholar 

  67. McLeod, B. D. and Kinsella, J. ‘Cholestasis associated with D-penicillamine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis’, Canâd. Med. Assoc. J. 120 (1979) 965–6.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kirby, J. D., Dieppe, P. A., Huskisson, E. C. and Smith, B. ‘D-penicillamine and immune complex deposition’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 38 (1979) 344–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Delamere, J. P., Grindulis, K. A. and Farr, M. ‘Effects on rheumatoid activity of drug-induced changes in serum immunoglobulins, particularly selective IgA deficiency’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 42 (1983) 231.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bucknall, R. C. ‘Myasthenia associated with D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis’, Proc. R. Soc. Med. 70 (Suppl. 3) (1977) 114–17.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Delamere, J. P., Jobson, S., Mackintosh, L. P., Wells, L. and Walton, K. W. ‘Penicillamine-induced myasthenia in rheumatoid arthritis: its clinical and genetic features’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 42 (1983) 500–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Stein, H. B., Patterson, A. C., Offer, R. C., Atkins, C. J., Tenfel, A. and Robinson, H. ‘Adverse effects of D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis’, Ann. Intern. Med. 92 (1980) 24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. See note 53.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Baum, J. A. ‘A continuing look at penicillamine’, J. Rheumatol. 6 (1979) 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Takavarasha, L., Scott, D. L. and Constable, T. J. ‘A pharmacist’s audit of antirheumatic drugs’, Rheumatol. Rehab. 21 (1982) 201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Capell, H. A., Hunter, J. A., Steven, M. M. and Murdoch, R. M. ‘The effects of order of administration of second-line therapy with particular reference to penicillamine’, in Maini, R. N. and Berry, H. (eds) Modulation of Autoimmunity and Disease: The Penicillamine Experience ( Eastbourne: Praeger, 1981 ) 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Harkness, J. A. L. and Blake, D. R. ‘Penicillamine nephropathy and iron’, Lancet, ii (1982) 1368–9.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Smith, D. H., Scott, D. L. and Zaphiropoulos, G. C. ‘Eosinophilia in D-penicillamine therapy’, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 42 (1983) 408–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. McConkey, B., Amos, R. S., Durham, S., Forster, P. J. G., Hubbal, S. and Walsh, L. ‘Sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis’, Br. Med. J. 280 (1980) 442–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1984 D. H. Goddard and R. C. Butler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, D.L. (1984). Penicillamine. In: Goddard, D.H., Butler, R.C. (eds) Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Treatment Controversy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08808-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08808-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-41920-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08808-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics