Advertisement

Alternative Aggregate Measures of Capacity Utilisation Based on a MACE Production Function

  • John Helliwell
  • Peter Sturm
  • Gérard Salou

Abstract

The concepts of potential output and capacity utilisation are important both in economic policy discussions and econometric model building. Concerning the former, the evaluation of a given policy stance and the accompanying budget position will to no small degree depend on—among other important factors—the assumed degree of capacity utilisation in the economy scrutinised. In macroeconomic models, the degree of capacity utilisation is likely to enter various important behavioural relationships — in particular price, import and export equations, but possibly also the various factor demand functions (e.g., investment and employment equations). In contrast to this crucial role of the concept of capacity utilisation in applied economics and policy analysis is the lack of a uniform definition of the important variable underlying it: potential output. The purpose of this chapter is not to analyse the reasons for the lack of uniformity with respect to potential output definitions and measurement or to attempt reducing the existing variety in this realm. Rather, this chapter reports on some preliminary results of ongoing research with a particular type of aggregate production function (MACE) and presents some alternative measures of potential output and capacity utilisation which can be derived from the MACE framework.

Keywords

Capital Stock Potential Output Real Wage Capacity Utilisation Full Employment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. HELLIWELL, J. F., McRAE, R. N., BOOTHE, P., HANSSON, A., MARGOLICK, M., PADMORE, T., PLOURDE, A. and PLUMMER, R. (1984a) ‘Energy and the National Economy: An Overview of the MACE Model’, in Scott, A. D. (ed.) Progress in Natural Resource Economics. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  2. HELLIWELL, J. F. MacGREGOR, M. E. and PADMORE, T. (1984b) ‘Economic Growth and Productivity in Canada, 1955–1990’, discussion paper. 84–30, (Vancouver: University of British Columbia).Google Scholar
  3. HELLIWELL, J. F. (1984c) ‘Stagflation and Productivity Decline in Canada 1974–82’, Canadian Journal of Economics. 17, pp. 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. HELLIWELL, J. F. STURM, P. and SALOU, G. (1984d) ‘International Comparison of the Sources of Productivity Slowdown 1973–1982’, working paper. 1465 (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research).Google Scholar
  5. HELLIWELL, J. F. STURM, P. and SALOU, G. (1984e) ‘A Revised INTERLINK Supply Block: Model Specification and Empirical Results’, typescript (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  6. OECD (1984) Economic Outlook. 36, p. 177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Derek Bosworth and David F. Heathfield 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Helliwell
  • Peter Sturm
  • Gérard Salou

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations