## Abstract

Many problems in capital theory — particularly ‘Austrian’ capital theory —take the following form: an asset has an To distinguish from intrinsic value, call this latter quantity the

*intrinsic value X*(*t*) at time*t.*If he takes a particular action at time*T*, then the asset’s owner gets*X*(*T*) at*T.*In anticipation of future usage we shall call the action taken at*T stopping*and refer to*T*as a*stopping time.*This set-up raises two natural, and related, questions. When should the intrinsic process be stopped? What is the present value of the asset? The standard examples are when to drink the wine whose quality at*t*is given by*X(t*) or when to cut down the tree which contains lumber with a value of*X*(*t*). If the discount rate is*r*then these questions may be simply answered. The optimal stopping time*T**maximizes*e*^{ -rT }*X*(*T*) and the present value of the tree is its discounted value(1)

*market value*of the asset.### Keywords

Mellon Monopoly## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- Arnold, L. (1974)
*Stochastic Differential Equations: Theory and Applications*(New York: Wiley).Google Scholar - Brock, W. A., R. Miller and J. Scheinkman (1982) ‘Natural Monopoly and Regulation’, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Chicago.Google Scholar
- Brock, W. A. and M. Rothschild (1986) ‘Comparative Statics for Multidimensional Optimal Stopping Problems’, pp.124–138 in
*Models of Economic Dynamics*(ed.) Hugo F. Sonnenshchein, Springer-Verlag*Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems*, vol. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brock, W. A., M. Rothschild and J. E. Stiglitz (1982) ‘Stochastic Capital Theory’, NBER Technical Report No. 23.Google Scholar
- Chow, Y. S., H. Robbins and D. Siegmund (1971)
*Great Expectations: The Theory of Optimal Stopping*(Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar - Cox, D. R. and H. D. Miller (1968)
*The Theory of Stochastic Processes*(New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar - Dothan, U. (1981) ‘Debt, Investment Opportunities, and Agency’. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Hartman, P. (1973)
*Ordinary Differential Equations*, 2nd edn (Baltimore: privately published).Google Scholar - Karlin, S. and H. M. Taylor (1981)
*A Second Course in Stochastic Processes*(New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar - Krylov, N. V. (1980)
*Controlled Diffusion Processes*(New York: Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - McDonald, R. L. and D. Siegel (1986) ‘The Value of Waiting to Invest’,
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 101: 707–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miller, R. and K. Voltaire (1980) ‘A Sequential Stochastic Tree Problem’,
*Economic Letters*, 5: 135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miller, R. and K. Voltaire (1983) ‘A Stochastic Analysis of the Tree Paradigm’, Carnegie Mellon University, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Working Paper 35–82–83, January.Google Scholar
- Miroshnichenko, T. P. (1975) ‘Optimal Stopping of the Integral of a Weiner Process’,
*Theory of Probability and Its Applications*, 20: 387–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shiryayev, A. N. (1978)
*Optimal Stopping Rules*(New York: Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar - Wentzell, A. D. (1981)
*A Course in the Theory of Stochastic Processes*(New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar - Ye, M. H., PhD Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1983.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© George R. Feiwel 1989