Perceptions and Reactions to SDI in the Benelux Countries

  • Robert J. Berloznik

Abstract

In the literature on European defence policy, the position of the smaller countries, such as the Benelux Countries, has generally been overlooked. The reasons for this are found not only in the relative ‘weight’ other countries have in the existing military and political alliances, but also in the fact that their positions on specific defence topics do not differ substantially from that of the ‘bigger’ nations. This was true until recently. The position of Belgium and the Netherlands regarding the NATO dual-track decision indicates that their attitude can indeed differ. The internal political and public pressure on the governments in both countries forced them to postpone the deployment decision. This relatively new situation of a strong internal discussion on defence-related matters also influences the way SDI is being perceived and reacted to. The’Dutch government did not take its final decision on cruise missile deployment until 7 November 1985. Therefore the discussion on SDI has been influenced by this pre-deployment atmosphere: the two questions constantly appear related to each other. The Belgian SDI debate has a post-deployment character. Because a part of the cruise missiles have already been deployed in late March 1985, SDI is generally being perceived as a new controversial defence issue following on the cruise missile debate.

Keywords

Europe Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Chambre of Representatives, Belgisch Staatsblad. Vragen en Antwoorden — question nr 25 from Mr Sleeckx (Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad, 12 March 1985).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Chambre of Representatives, Belgisch Staatsblad. Beknopt Verslag (Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad, 28 March 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 9.
    Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Een Buitenlands Beleid ten Dienste van de Vrede, Veiligheid en Ontwapening (Brussels: Department of Foreign Affairs, May 1985) p. 89.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Chambre of Representatives, Belgisch Staatsblad. Vergaderingen van 12 mei 1985 (Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad, 22 May 1985) pp. 983–7.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Chambre of Representatives. Belgisch Staatsblad. Vergaderingen van 22 mei 1985 (Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad, 22 May 1985).Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Chambre of Representatives, Belgisch Staatsblad. Vergaderingen van 22 mei 1985 (Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad, 22 May 1985) p. 987.Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    European Institute for Peace and Security (EIPS), Star Wars Strategy: Implications and Consequences for the Europeans of the Atlantic Alliance, vol. 1 (Brussels: EIPS, June 1984).Google Scholar
  8. 25.
    Michel Wautelet, Aspects Scientifiques de l’IDS, a Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur la Paix (GRIP) publication, nr 81 (Brussels: GRIP, June 1985);Google Scholar
  9. André Dumoulin and Xavier Zeebroek, Missiles Anti-Ballistiques et Traité ABM face à l’IDS, a GRIP publication, nr 82 (Brussels: GRIP, June 1985);Google Scholar
  10. Rik Coolsaet, L’Europe face à l’IDS, a GRIP publication, nr 83 (Brussels: GRIP, June 1985).Google Scholar
  11. 26.
    International Association for University Peace Days, Het Amerikaanse Strategische Defensie Initiatief, document nr 1 (Brussels: IAUDP, August 1985).Google Scholar
  12. 35.
    Second Chamber, Handelingen. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, nr 33, 18–20 June (The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij, 1985) p. 5885.Google Scholar
  13. 43.
    Pax Christi, Advies Pax Christi aan de Nederlandse Bisschoppenkon-ferentie inzake de standpuntbepaling t.o.v. Star Wars (The Hague: 17 April 1985).Google Scholar
  14. 46.
    G. C. Berkhof, Duel om de Ruimte (The Hague: Institute Clingendael, 1985).Google Scholar
  15. 56.
    Robert Berloznik, Patrick de Boosere, Star Wars (Berchem: Uitgeverij EPO, 1986).Google Scholar
  16. 57.
    J. Van Bentum (ed.), Vrede Met Star Wars? (Nijmegen, 1986).Google Scholar
  17. 58.
    Philip Everts (ed.), De Droom der Ontwetsbaarheid. Het Amerikaanse Strategisch Defensie Initiatif en het belang van Europa (Kampen: Kok Agora. 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hans Günter Brauch 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Berloznik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations