Abstract
The aim of this paper is to survey the protectionist arguments which have been commonly put forward in relation to the economic development of the under-developed countries. I shall begin in Section II with a brief account of the traditional ‘infant industry’ and kindred arguments for protection. In Sections III and IV I shall consider a number of more recent arguments for protection, first on the cost side and next on the demand side of the question, which claim to deal with the broader structural and dynamic problems of economic development of the under-developed countries. In Section V we shall consider some of the difficulties of pursuing an effective protectionist policy in the setting of the present-day under-developed countries, which suggest a conflict, at the practical level, between such a policy and the commonly adopted form of over-all economic development planning involving an all-round restriction of imports.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
G. Haberler, ‘Some Problems in the Pure Theory of International Trade’, Economic Journal, June 1950, pp. 236 et seq.
F. H. Knight, ‘Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1924.
M. C. Kemp, ‘The Mill-Bastable Infant Industry Dogma’, Journal of Political Economy, Feb. 1960.
W. A. Lewis, ‘Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour’, Manchester School, May 1954, p. 185.
E. E. Hagen, ‘An Economic Justification for Protection’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1958, pp. 497–8.
R. Nurkse, ‘Some International Aspects of Economic Development’, American Economic Review, May 1952; and ‘The Conflict between “Balanced Growth’’ and International Specialisation’, published by Istanbul and Ankara Universities (to be referred to hereafter as the ‘Istanbul Lecture’); and ‘The Trade of Poor Countries and the International Economics of Growth’, a lecture given at the Institut de Science Économique Appliqué, Paris, 1958.
Cf. P. N. Rosenstein-Rodan, ‘Problems of Industrialisation of E. and S.E. Europe’, Economic Journal, 1943.
J. M. Fleming, ‘External Economies and the Doctrine of Balanced Growth’, Economic Journal, June 1955.
Beyond this we get into the broader sociological generalizations concerning the ‘educative’ effects of manufacturing industry and its superiority in providing ‘the growing points for increased technical knowledge, urban education, the dynamism and resilience that goes with urban civilization’, etc. Cf. H. W. Singer, ‘The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May 1950, pp. 476–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1963 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myint, H. (1963). Infant Industry Arguments for Assistance to Industries in the Setting of Dynamic Trade Theory. In: Harrod, R., Hague, D. (eds) International Trade Theory in a Developing World. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08458-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08458-6_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08460-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08458-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)