Advertisement

Trusteeship, Indirect Rule and Colonial Development

  • Max Beloff

Abstract

The most obvious fact about British policy in relation to those territories for which the Colonial Office was responsible was that it could hardly be said to exist. The territories themselves — crown colonies, protectorates, mandates, and lesser islands and enclaves — were so varied in size and population and in the level of economic, social and cultural development to which they had attained, that no system that could be designed for some of them would not be wholly unsuitable for others. In this the dependencies reflected the very varied circumstances of their original acquisition and the different degrees of importance attached to them from an economic or strategic perspective. In contrast to the Indian Empire, they were not thought of in terms of future self-government, at however distant a date, nor (except temporarily in regard to the German colonial claims) was the idea of parting with any of them seriously entertained. They were territories subject to the sovereignty of the British Crown in Parliament and had to be governed in some fashion according to the constitutional precedents and available administrative machinery.

Keywords

Labour Party High Commissioner White Settlement Colonial Policy Close Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Lord Hailey, An African Survey ( London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1938 ), p. 247.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    see A. Roberts (ed.), The Cambridge History of Africa, vol. 7 (Cambridge, 1986), 667 ff.Google Scholar
  3. William Boyd, An Ice-Cream War (London, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Lord Lugard, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (London, 1922), p. 617.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    see Kenneth Robinson, The Dilemmas of Trusteeship (London, 1965).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sir C. Ponsonby, Ponsonby Remembers (Oxford, 1965), p. 115.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    see Penelope Hetherington, British Paternalism and Africa, 1920–1940 (London, 1974).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    P.S. Gupta, Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964 (London, 1975), 126 ff.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    P.B. Rich, Race and Empire in British Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 50.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See J.H. Oldham, White and Black in Africa (London, 1930).Google Scholar
  11. see R.L. Buell, The Native Problem in Africa 2 vols (New York, 1928).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.D. Roberts (ed.), The Cambridge History of Africa vol. 7 (London, 1986).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    David Carlton, MacDonald v. Henderson (London, 1970 ), 18.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    See Sir Charles Jeffries, The Colonial Office (London, 1956).Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    see C. Jeffries, The Colonial Empire and its Civil Service (Cambridge, 1938 ).Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    R.Heussler, Yesterday’s Rulers: the Making of the British Colonial Service (Syracuse, N.Y., 1963).Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    L.M. Thompson, The Political Mythology of Apartheid (New Haven, Conn., 1985), pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
  18. 32.
    R. Hyams, Failure of South African Expansion, 1908–1948 (London, 1972), pp. 64–5.Google Scholar
  19. 33.
    See M. Chanock, Unconsummated Union — Britain, Rhodesia and South Africa (Manchester, 1977).Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    Hugh Tinker in his Separate and Unequal: India and the Indians in the British Commonwealth, 1920–1950 (London, 1976).Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    See H. Lathy, ‘India and East Africa: Imperial Partnership at the end of the First World War’, ICH, vol. VI, no. 2 (1971), pp. 55–85.Google Scholar
  22. 42.
    S. Gopal, Jawarhalal Nehru vol. 1 (London, 1975), 100 ff.Google Scholar
  23. 43.
    R.G. Gregory, India and East Africa, a History of Race Relations within the British Empire, 1890–1939 ( Oxford, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    See R. Oliver, The Missionary Factor in East Africa (London, 1952 ).Google Scholar
  25. 53.
    See A.N. Wills, An Introduction to the History of Central Africa (London, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  26. 59.
    C. Palley, The Constitutional History and Law of Southern Rhodesia, 1888–1965 (Oxford, 1966), pp. 330–1.Google Scholar
  27. Robert Blake, A History of Southern Rhodesia (London, 1977), ch. 15.Google Scholar
  28. 61.
    See R. Robinson, ‘Non-European foundations of European imperialism: a sketch for a theory of collaboration’, in R. Owen and B. Sutcliffe eds, Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London, 1972 ).Google Scholar
  29. 63.
    See A. Gaitskell, Gezira: a story of development in the Sudan (London, 1959 ).Google Scholar
  30. 64.
    Sir Ivor Jennings and H.W. Tambiah, The Dominion of Ceylon: the Development of its Laws and Constitution (London, 1952), pp. 20–3.Google Scholar
  31. 65.
    Victor Purcell, Memoirs of a Malayan Official (London, 1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Max Beloff 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Beloff
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations