Advertisement

Victim Assistance and the Criminal Justice System: the Victim’s Perspective

  • Joanna Shapland

Abstract

The reactions of victims to the criminal justice system and to society’s attempts to assist them cannot be understood without, first, considering the effects of crime on the victim. These effects are not confined to the immediate consequences of the offense – physical injury, shock, loss of property, time off work or financial losses. They can intrude into most of the areas of the victim’s life – producing a change in his relationships with members of his family, neighbors, friends or work colleagues. There are also the costs involved in being a victim in the criminal justice system.

Keywords

Sexual Assault Criminal Justice System Psychological Effect Financial Loss Social Security Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Notes

  1. Brown, S. D., and Yantzi, M. (1980), Needs Assessment for Victims and Witnessess of Crime, report prepared for the Mennonite Central Committee and Ministry of Correctional Services, Province of Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Burns, P. (1980), Criminal Injuries Compensation (Ontario: Butterworths).Google Scholar
  3. Doerner, W. G., and Lab, S. P. (1980), “The Impact of Crime Compensation upon Victim Attitudes Toward the Criminal Justice System,” Victimology, pp. 61–7.Google Scholar
  4. Harland, A. T. (1978), “Compensating the Victims of Crime,” Criminal Law Bulletin, pp. 203–24.Google Scholar
  5. Home Office (1961), Compensation for Victims of Crimes of Violence Cmnd 1406 (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  6. Home Office and Scottish Home and Health Department (1978), Review of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme: Report of an Interdepartmental Working Party (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  7. Howley, J. (1982), “Victim-Police Interaction and Its Effects on Public Attitudes to the Police”, M.Sc. thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, D. O. (1982), “Victims’ Reactions to the Criminal Justice Response,” paper delivered at 1982 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, June 6, 1982, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Maguire, M. (1982), Burglary in a dwelling: the Offence, the Offender and the Victim (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  10. Miers, D. (1979), Responses to Victimization (Abingdon: Professional Books).Google Scholar
  11. Miers, D. (1982), “Compensation to Victims of Crime”, paper given at International Symposium on Victimology, Sicily, Italy, 3–10 Jan. 1982, Victimology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  12. National District Attorneys Association (1977), Commission on Victim Witness Assistance, final evaluation report.Google Scholar
  13. Shapland, J., Willmore, J., and Duff, P. (1981), The Victim in the Criminal Justice System, final report to the Home Office.Google Scholar
  14. Shapland, J. (1982), Compensation to Victims of Violent Crime, final report to the Home Office.Google Scholar
  15. Shapland, J. (1983), “Victims and the Criminal Justice System”, paper given to 33rd International Course in Criminology, Vancouver, Canada, 6–11 Mar. 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Thorvaldson, S. A., and Krasnick, M. R. (1980), “On Recovering Compensation Funds from Offenders,” Victimology, vol. 5, pp. 18–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ezzat A. Fattah 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Shapland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations