Abstract
Time is experienced, time is imagined: the one is formed by the other, the other is formed by the one. This is the enigma that Keynes unwittingly sought twice by different means to solve. In the solitary present moment, in the individual mind, both themes proceed as one. But in order to formalise them and so understand the effects they can produce, we must envisage them separately. The Treatise on Money did not in its central apparatus make explicit the idea of expectation, the idea of imagined time. The General Theory spoke of equilibrium instead of the suggestive and impelling power of the divergence of result from expectation. The Treatise used implicitly, unwittingly, the distinction of what is conceived ex ante from what is perceived ex post, Gunnar Myrdal’s momentous formulation which in the Treatise year he had just published in a Swedish thesis, and which compelled economists to recognise that time-to-come is different in nature from time past. This distinction is latent in the Fundamental Equations of Treatise chapter 10.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1988 G. L. S. Shackle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frowen, S.F. (1988). Treatise, Theory and Time. In: Frowen, S.F. (eds) Business, Time and Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08100-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08100-4_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08102-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08100-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)