Skip to main content

Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’

  • Chapter
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

Among the various senses of ‘materialism’ distinguished in the preceding study as relevant to Marx’s understanding of it, a ‘dialectical’ variety does not figure. This may surprise the reader who has heard of Marx as a representative, or even as the effective originator of a doctrine called ‘dialectical materialism’. Now it is certainly the case that the term does not occur in Marx’s writings (nor in those of Engels for that matter).2 But it is no less true that he considered himself as using a ‘dialectical method’ and that he held a ‘dialectic’ to be at work in the real world both of nature and society.3 Unfortunately it is not at all clear what Marx meant by this. On a couple of occasions he expressed his intention of writing a short work on the subject,4 but this is one of the many projects that he did not carry through. What writing there is on the subject in the Marxist tradition gives even less help than usual.5 So there is nothing for it but to start from scratch and to try to produce an account of Marx’s thinking on this theme based on what he himself wrote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Chapter 3 Marx, Hegel and ‘CONTRADICTION’

  • E.g. G. Lukacs, History and Class Consciousness (1923, London: Merlin Press, 1971) p. 132. Cf. also the 1967 preface, p. xix.

    Google Scholar 

  • It should be noted that my use of the term ‘emancipation’ and cognates is not an allusion to Habermas’s idea of ‘emancipatory interest’. See e.g. J. Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (London: Heinemann, 1972) esp. ch. 9, and Appendix (especially pp. 311ff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Lukacs, Die Eigenart des Aesthetischen, 1 Hbbd (Werke, Bd 11) (Neuwied-Berlin: Luchterhand, 1963) pp. 45f. Cf. also p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Texts on Method (tr. T. Carver) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974) p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • For a more detailed exposition see W. Suchting, ‘Marx on the Dialectics of Production and Consumption in the Introduction to the Grundrisse’ Social Praxis, 3 (1975) 291-314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 W. A. Suchting

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suchting, W.A. (1986). Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’. In: Suchting, W.A. (eds) Marx and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08071-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics