Abstract
In their discussion of the aesthetic movement, the implications of ‘art for art’s sake’ , and the phenomenon of the 1890s, Walter E. Houghton and G. Robert Stange focus on a curious occurrence: ‘Out-of-the-way and queer writers were sought out; the elaborate metres of medieval French and Italian poetry were revived. But most important was the sudden addiction to, and liberal borrowing from, the works of nineteenth-century Frenchmen.’1 To explain how this addiction came to exist and indeed to endure through the first decade of the twentieth century one must look first to the writers who preceded the writers of the 1890s and influenced the course of their literary lives. Beginning in the 1860s, several writers and critics contributed to a newly developing sense of the importance of French literature and began to exercise a profound influence upon the course of English attitudes towards the literature, culture and intellectual history of France; chief among them were Matthew Arnold, Algernon Charles Swinburne and, above all, Walter Pater, although such writers as John Morley and Andrew Lang also set the stage for a growing appreciation of French literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
W. Houghton and G. R. Stange, Victorian Poetry and Poetics (Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1968) p. 755.
Edmund Gosse, Life of Swinburne (London: Macmillan, 1917) p. 168.
Swinburne was the first in England to write of Baudelaire and is generally credited with introducing Gautier’s formulation of ‘art for art’s sake’ to English readers in his William Blake (London: Hotten, 1868) p. 101. For a more extensive discussion of Swinburne’ s place in introducing French literature to English readers, see John J. Conlon, Walter Pater and the French Tradition (Lewisburg Pa: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses, 1982) ch. 1.
See Matthew Arnold, Lectures and Essays in Criticism, ed. R. H. Super (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962) p. 230.
F. J. W. Harding, Matthew Arnold: The Critic and France (Geneva: Droz, 1964) p. 133. For an extended discussion or Arnold’s uses of French literature and his interest in France, see
Iris Sells, Matthew Arnold and France (1935; New York: Octagon, 1970) and
Patricia Thompson, George Sand and the Victorians (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977) ch. 6.
For an examination of Pater’s disciples and influence see John Pick, ‘Divergent Disciples of Walter Pater’, Thought, 23 (Mar 1948) 114–28.
See Richard Ellmann’s essay above (ch. 1), and also John J. Conlon, ‘Eliot and Pater: Criticism in Transition’, English Literature in Transition, 25.3 (1982) 169–77.
Walter Pater, The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry, ed. Donald L. Hill (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1980) p. xii. Subsequent page references appear in the text, where possible.
Germain d’Hangest, Walter Pater, l’homme et l’œuvre (Paris: Didier, 1961), II, 16–17 (my translation).
See Pater, Marius the Epicurean (London: Macmillan, 1885) II, 14.
Pater, Miscellaneous Studies (London: Macmillan, 1895) p. 13.
See Clarence Decker, ‘Zola’s Literary Reputation in England’, PMLA 59 (Dec 1934) 1140–53; and
John J. Conlon, ‘Walter Pater and Zola’s Literary Reputation in England’, English Literature in Transition, 19.4 (1976) 306–12.
Pater, ‘Toussaint Galabru’, Nineteenth Century, 25 (Apr 1889) 622.
Pater, Essays from ‘The Guardian’ (London: Macmillan, 1896) p. 121.
Pater, ‘A Century of Revolution’, Nineteenth Century, 26 (Dec 1889) 993.
For a more detailed listing of translations of Zola’s work, a general sense of his reception in contemporary England, and a brief examination of his life and work see John J. Conlon, ‘Emile Zola’, Critical Survey of Long Fiction: Foreign Language Series, ed. F. Magill (Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Salem Press, 1984) pp. 1982–95.
Lionel Johnson, ‘The Works of Mr Pater’, (1894) in Post Liminium (London: Elkin Matthews, 1911) p. 20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Ceri Crossley and Ian Small
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conlon, J.J. (1988). The Reception of French Literature in England, 1885–1914. In: Crossley, C., Small, I. (eds) Studies in Anglo-French Cultural Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07921-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07921-6_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07923-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07921-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)