Skip to main content

The Dual Track Decision: the European Dimension

  • Chapter
The European Defence Initiative

Abstract

The case for the Dual Track Decision (DTD) was advanced by NATO for reasons of high policy and of principle. It embodied a notion of collective action by the Atlantic Alliance in the name of European security. Its provisions were two-fold: The deployment in Western Europe of 108 US Pershing II intermediate range ballistic missiles (IRBM) and 464 Tomahawk ground launched Cruise missiles (GLCM) in response to Soviet deployment of SS-20 IRBMs targeted at Western Europe, while simultaneously engaging in negotiation for reduction or elimination of these sytems. At the end of 1983 negotiations with the Soviet Union were broken off and full deployment of US systems were gradually implemented. This situation then led to heightened East—West tensions until early in 1985 when both super-powers agreed to negotiate arms control agreements with respect to strategic and intermediate missiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Johan Holst, INF and Political Equilibrium in Europe (Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, June 1983) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johan Holst, The Dual Track Decision Revisited, (Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Apr. 1983) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karl E. Birnbaum, Arms Control in Europe: Problems and Prospects (Austrian Institute for International Affairs, Mar. 1980) p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Carlton and Carlo Schaerf (eds), The Arms Race in the 1980’s (London, The Macmillan Press, 1982) p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles R. Gellner, British and French Nuclear Forces in the INF Negotiations (Washington US GPO, July 1983) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. George Treverton, Nuclear Weapons in Europe, Adelphi Papers no. 168, (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1981) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute for Defence and Disarmament Studies, The Arms Control Reporter, A Chronicle of Treaties-Negotiations-Proposals (Brooklyn Mass., IDDS, 1983) p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guido Vigeveno, The Bomb and European Security (London: C. Hurst & Co., 1983) pp. 88–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Geoffrey Lee Williams and Alan Lee Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G.L., Williams, A.L. (1986). The Dual Track Decision: the European Dimension. In: The European Defence Initiative. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07825-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics