Skip to main content
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

I first stumbled upon George Whalley’s ‘The Mariner and the Albatross’ more than twenty years ago. It certainly didn’t resemble a Brooks and Warren exercise in close textual analysis, and I doubt whether I could have said then why I found it memorable. Those graduate schooldays were too much taken up with an instinctive recoil from the ‘perverse, ingenious, desolate’ (p.43) gospel of Northrop Frye that held sway at the University of Western Ontario. There was no one to direct me to Professor Whalley’s wonderfully just and prophetic review of The Anatomy of Criticism, from which I borrow this judgement. Many years later, when I finally came to teach my first course in the history of literary criticism, I knew just enough to seek out his ‘On Translating Aristotle’s Poetics’. It served me well as goad and guide to a fresh understanding of long familiar passages I mistakenly assumed to be within my grasp. The critical rationale for this book is simply this: if these, the first three essays in the volume, have helped me find my way, then they and the balance of the selection, may do the same for a generation of students and teachers who, whether they realise it or not, desperately need an alternative to structuralism, semiotics and deconstruction.

‘I hate everything that merely instructs me without increasing or directly quickening my activity.’ These words of Goethe, like a sincere ceterum censeo, may well stand at the head of my thoughts.…

(Nietzsche, The Use and Abuse of History)

(And talking is always a commitment to a world.)

(Ian Robinson, The Survival of English)

The danger of this darkness is easily belittled by our impoverished use of the word ‘thought’. This word is generally used as if it meant an activity necessary to scientists when they come up against a difficulty in their research, or some vague unease beyond calculation when we worry about our existence. Thought is steadfast attention to the whole. The darkness is fearful, because what is at stake is whether anything is good.

(George Grant, English-Speaking Justice)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Letters of Charles and Mary Lamb, ed. E. V. Lucas (London, 1935) 1, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., 1, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., 11, 191.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collected Letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge [hereafter referred to as CL], ed. E. L. Griggs (Oxford, 1956–71) IV, 975 (? Nov 1819).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coleridge may be thinking of his ‘Allegoric Vision’ — The Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. E. H. Coleridge (Oxford, 1912) 11, 1091–6. This prose allegory, written August 1795, was successively used for an attack on the Church of England, for an attack on the Church of Rome, and in the introduction to A Lay Sermon: Addressed to the Higher and Middle Classes. In the ‘Allegoric Vision’ Coleridge does not in any sense allegorise himself.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a consideration of the place of opium as inducing Coleridge’s ‘Bad most shocking Dreams’, as an element in the composition of ‘The Ancient Mariner’, and specifically as a factor in the image of Life-in-Death, see R. C. Bald, ‘Coleridge and “The Ancient Mariner”’, in Nineteenth-Century Studies, ed. H. Davis, W. C. De Vane and R. C. Bald (Ithaca, NY, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Too little is known of the date of composition of the gloss, and of the process of revision. For the date of important revisions to ‘The Ancient Mariner’, see J. L. Lowes, The Road to Xanadu, rev. edn (Boston, Mass., and New York, 1930) pp. 475–6. For successive changes in the ‘Courts of the Sun’ gloss, see ibid., pp. 164ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Edmund Blunden in Coleridge: Studies by Several Hands on the Hundredth Anniversary of His Death, ed. E. Blunden and E. L. Griggs (London, 1934) p. 66: ‘I sometimes wonder whether, germinally, the “Ancient Mariner” altogether is not one of his Christ’s Hospital poems. I mean … that he had to travel through a long period of haunted solitariness.’

    Google Scholar 

  9. CL, I, 369 (6 Jan 1798). Cf. The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge [hereafter referred to as CN], ed. Kathleen Coburn (New York and London, 1957–72) III, 3324: ‘when I am in company with Mr Sharp [et al.] … I feel like a Child — nay, rather like an Inhabitant of another Planet — their very faces all act upon me, sometimes, as if they were Ghosts, but more often as if I were a Ghost among them — at all times, as if we were not consubstantial’.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. T. S. Eliot, The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism (London, 1933) p. 69, where the eagle is used as the symbol of the creative imagination. Coleridge also seems to be using the symbol in an epigram of 1807 in reply to Poole’s encouragement: ‘Let Eagle bid the Tortoise sunward rise — / As vainly Strength speaks to a broken mind’ (Poetical Works, II, 1001). Cf. Shelley’s description of Coleridge as ‘a hooded eagle among blinking owls.’

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, ed. E. de Selincourt and Helen Darbishire (Oxford, 1940–9) 1, 360–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas Carlyle, The Life of John Sterling, in Complete Works of Thomas Carlyle (New York, 1853) xx, 60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whalley, G. (1985). Introduction. In: Studies in Literature and the Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07777-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics