Skip to main content

The Human Environment: Stockholm and its Follow Up

  • Chapter
Global Issues in the United Nations’ Framework

Abstract

The United Nations’ Conference on the Human Environment was held in Stockholm 5–16 June 1972. Some commentators say it was ‘the most important conference ever held’.1 Never before had so many world leaders come together to discuss ‘the future of our species and the habitat in which it lives’.2 Yet, the Conference took place without the participation of the whole Eastern bloc, which had refused to take part after a quibble about the non-recognition of the German Democratic Republic, a problem which 15 years later appears largely historic. The importance of the Conference was, however, greatly reduced by the absence of socialist countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. P. Scott in his Foreword to P. Stone, Did We Save the Earth at Stockholm? (London: Earth Island, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On protection of forests for such purposes see J.E. King, Science and Rationalisation in the Government of Louis XIV (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1949) p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. L.K. Caldwell, International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1984), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Council of Europe, Man in a European Society (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the IBP, see, for example, E.B. Worthington (ed.), The Evolution of IBP: The International Biological Programme (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975). Another field of study was set to be human adaptibility to changing conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.T. Gati, The United States, The United Nations and the Management of Global Change (New York, New York University Press; 1983) pp. 316–7 and below.

    Google Scholar 

  7. British Institute of International and Comparative Law (ed.), Selected Documents on International Environmental Law (London and New York: Dobbs Ferry, 1975) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.T. Gati, The United States, The United Nations and the Management of Global Change (New York: New York University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. On this see, J. Schneider, World Public Order of the Environment: towards an International Ecological Law and Organization (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979) p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Some claim that ‘fault’ is necessary; but it is often impossible to prove negligence in environmental matters; cf. A.L. Springer, The International Law of Pollution: (Westport, Conn.: Protecting the Global Environment in a World of Sovereign States, Quorum Books, 1983), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Paul Taylor and A. J. R. Groom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Lupis, I.D. (1989). The Human Environment: Stockholm and its Follow Up. In: Taylor, P., Groom, A.J.R. (eds) Global Issues in the United Nations’ Framework. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07734-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics