The Origins and Institutional Setting of the UN Special Conferences

  • Paul Taylor

Abstract

This book examines a selection of the special conferences which have been organised through the United Nations’ system over the last 20 years and which have been concerned with some of the more pressing global problems of that period: the control of the growth of population, the problem of producing and distributing food, the issues of racial discrimination, disarmament and development, the protection of the environment, and the difficulties in the way of defining and promoting the rights of women. The most obvious question which occurs is: why did such conferences seem necessary then, particularly in the 1970s? It might have been expected, after all, that new problems would have been dealt with adequately through established arrangements, which were already very extensive in scope and competence. Despite this, however, special conferences were arranged; the peculiar circumstances in which this happened are discussed in this chapter. A number of related questions about the way in which the conferences were set up, how they worked, and their contribution to tackling specific problems, obviously also arise in this context. They are set out in the conclusions to this chapter, and are discussed, with special reference to the specific conferences, in later chapters.

Keywords

Coherence Nited Defend Allo OECD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    A. Leroy Bennett, International Organizations: Principles and Issues (2nd edn) (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1980) p. 310.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ronald Inglehart, ‘An end to European Integration?’ American Political Science Review, Vol. 61 (March 1967) pp. 93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.)Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Charles R. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    See Theotonio Dos Santos, ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review, Vol. 60 (May 1970) No. 2, pp. 231–6.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See John P. Renninger with James Zech, The 11th Special Session and the Future of Global Negotiations (New York: UNITAR, 1981).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    See, for instance, Quincy Wright, The Study of International Relations (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955) p. 12.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Graham T. Allison, The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston: Little, Brown, 1971).Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Randolph Kent, ‘Relief Agencies at Work’ in Paul Taylor and A. J. R. Groom (eds), International Institutions at Work London: Frances Pinter, 1988).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    See Evan Luard, International Agencies (London: Macmillan, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    See David Mitrany, A Working Peace System (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1966) especially pp.68–73.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Houshang Ameri, Politics and Process in the Specialized Agencies of the United Nations, (Aldershot: Gower, 1982) p. 92.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    Martin Hill, The United Nations System: Coordinating its Economic and Social Work (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978) p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 23.
    Quoted in John P. Renninger, ECOSOC; Options for Reform (New York: UNITAR, 1981) p. 5.Google Scholar
  15. 28.
    Thomas G. Weiss, ‘The UN Conference on the Least Developed Countries’, International Affairs. Vol. 59 (Autumn 1983) No. 4 pp. 649–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 60.
    See Victor-Yves Ghebali, ‘The Politicization of UN Specialized Agencies: A Preliminary Analysis’, Journal of International Studies, Millennium, Vol. 14 (Winter 1985) No. 3, pp. 317–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Taylor and A. J. R. Groom 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations