Assessing Strategic Change

  • George A. Luffman
  • Richard Reed


When seeking to assess the nature of strategic change there are potentially many different ways in which the research may be conducted. The choice of methodology may have a significant effect on the results and will need to be reviewed carefully when looking at the implications and drawing conclusions. The purpose of this chapter is to provide some detailed information on the approach to the research problem, the methodology used to tackle the problem and the sample of companies investigated. Parts of the chapter are technical and may not be of interest to the general reader, who could readily move on to Chapter 3. All the major constructs reviewed in this chapter are reiterated briefly at the appropriate point in the later chapters to facilitate understanding.


Vertical Integration Share Price Parent Company Standard Industrial Classification Herfindahl Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. A. G. Robinson, Structure of Competitive Industry (Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1931).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Florence, The Logic of British and American Industry, 2nd ed., (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Edwards, H. Townsend, British Enterprise, (London: Macmillan, 1961).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edith T. Penrose, Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Herfindahl Index was originally developed by O. C. Herfindahl as a measure of concentration for the US Steel Industry. For further discussion on its use see C. H. Berry, Corporate Growth and Diversification (Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1974) p. 62.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. K. Gorecki, ‘The Measurement of Enterprise Diversification’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 56, no. 3 (August 1974) pp. 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. A. Adelman, ‘Comment on the “H” Concentration Measure as a Numbers Equivalent’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 51, no. 1 (February 1969) pp. 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    CSO, Standard Industrial Classifications (rev. ed. 1980) (London: HMSO, 1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Wrigley, ‘Divisional Autonomy and Diversification’ (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University) quoted by R. P. Rumelt and D. F. ChannonGoogle Scholar
  10. see notes 11 and 17 below.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    R. P. Rumelt, Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance (Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School (Division of Research), 1974) p. 11.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Ibid. p. 14.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    For example see D. F. Channon, The Strategy and Structure of British Enterprise (London: Macmillan, 1975), or G. A. Luffman, R. Reed, ‘Diversification in British Industry in the 1970s’, Strategic Management Journal vol. 3, no. 4 (1982) pp. 303–14, or R. P. Rumelt, op cit. p. 15.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Ibid. p. 16.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Ibid. p. 16.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    To gain a full appreciation of the logic used by Rumelt in the derivation of the strategic classification system, and the various refinements he chose to make, it is necessary to refer to the whole of the first chapter of his book — see note 11 above.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    D. F. Channon, op. cit.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    A. A. Berle, G. C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1932).Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    W. E. Halal, ‘Return on Resources Model of Corporate Performance’,California Management Review, vol. 19, no. 4 (Summer 1977) pp. 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    G. A. Luffman, S. F. Witt, S. Lister, ‘A Quantitative Approach to Stakeholder Interests’, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 3, no. 1 (Mar 1982).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    The Times 1000 (London: The Times Newspapers Ltd, 1970) p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    D. F. Channon, op. cit.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    The main alternative sources of information consulted for purposes of classification and/or confirmation of data were:Google Scholar
  24. Company reports, house journals, annual reviews and reports to employees.Google Scholar
  25. Referencing services included McCarthy’s, Predicasts and Business Surveys Research.Google Scholar
  26. Newspaper articles from The Times, Financial Times, Guardian, Daily Telegraph, Birmingham Post etc.Google Scholar
  27. Journal articles from Investors Chronicle, Business Weekly etc.Google Scholar
  28. Investment reports by Panmure, Gordon; Laurie, Millbank; Illingworth & Herriques; Rowe & Pitman; and Buckmaster & Moore.Google Scholar
  29. 23.
    Extel Analyst’s Service Cards 1982.Google Scholar
  30. 24.
    Extel Handbook of Market Leaders (issues 2–13) (London: Extel, 1971–82).Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    Moodies’ Investment Handbook (issues 1971–5) (London: Moodies Services, 1971–5).Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    Extel British Services Cards (back issues), 1975–8.Google Scholar
  33. 27.
    CSO, Annual Abstract of Statistics (London: HMSO, 1975, 1981 eds).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© George A. luffman and Richard Reed 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • George A. Luffman
  • Richard Reed

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations