The Stiffness and Damping of Lubricated Joints Subject to Normal Loads

  • S. N. Shoukry
  • R. H. Thornley


This paper reports the results of an experimental study carried out on a variety of joint surfaces to investigate the influence of introducing lubricant in between the joint interface. Joints having different surface topographies were tested. The viscosity of lubricant is shown to have a marKed effect upon both the dynamic stiffness and damping of joints. The mechanism of the action of the lubricant layer is discussed. It has been shown that the joint stiffness could be increased to almost the stiffness of its equivalent solid by introducing a layer of Hermetite. Moreover, a considerable gain in the interface layer damping is achieved.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Taylor (1965) A Computer Analysis of an Openside Planing Machine. 6th Int. MTDR Conf. p.197.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.N. Reshetov (1965) Machine Tool Design Calculations. Machines and Tooling, XL11, No.11, p.4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.H. Thornley, R. Connolly, M. Barash and F. Koenigsberger (1965) The Effect of Surface Topography Upon the Static Stiffness of Machine Tool Joints. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 5, p,57.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Connolly and R.H. Thornley (1965) The Significance of Joints on the Overall Deflection of Machine Tool Structures. Int. MTDR Conf., p. 139.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.N. ShouKry and R.H. Thornley (1981) Theoretical Expressions for the Normal and Tangential Stiffness of Machine Tool Joints. Proc. 22 Int. MTDR Conf., p131.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.R.H. Khoyi (1976) Some Aspects of Damping and Dynamic Characteristics of Machine Tool Structural Joints. Ph.D., Aston Univ.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.N. Reshetov and Z.M. Levina (1956) Damping of Oscillations in the Couplings of Components of Machines. Vestnik Mashinostroyeniya No.12. (Translated from Russian).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Corbach (1965) Die Dynamisch Steifigheit Ruhender und Beweglicher Verbindugen Werkzeugmaachinen. Machineemark, J.72, Nr.79 (Translation UMIST 1969)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.A. Greenwood (1967) The Area of Contact Between Rough Surfaces and Flats. Trans. ASME, J. Lub. Tech., 89, p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.S. Sayles and T.R. Thomas (1978) Three-Dimensional Roughness Measurement with a Stylus Instrument. Microtecnic 2, p. 33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.R. NayaK (1973) Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces in Plastic Contact. Wear 26, p. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.S. Sayles and T.R. Thomas (1978) Computer Simulation of the Contact of Rough surfaces. Wear 49, p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Birmingham 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Shoukry
    • 1
  • R. H. Thornley
    • 2
  1. 1.Helwan UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.The University of Aston in BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations