Skip to main content

Rep Plays and Pinter Plays

  • Chapter
Pinter
  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

Although Pinter has had little to say in particular terms about how his years in rep have affected his play-writing, he has made a number of general comments on the subject in the interview with Richard Findlater cited at the beginning of Chapter 1. Pinter points to what he considers fundamental influences upon him as a playwright:

Yes, my experience as an actor has influenced my plays — it must have — though it’s impossible for me to put my finger on it exactly. I think I certainly developed some feeling for construction which, believe it or not, is important to me, and for speakable dialogue. I had a pretty good notion in my earlier plays of what would shut an audience up; not so much what would make them laugh; that I had no ideas about. Whenever I write for the stage I merely see the stage I’ve been used to. I have worked for theatre in the round and enjoyed it, but it doesn’t move me to write plays with that method in mind. I always think of the normal picture-frame stage which I used as an actor.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Pinter, in Twentieth Century, Feb 1961, p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harold Pinter, ‘Speech: Hamburg 1970’, Theatre Quarterly, i, no. 3 (1971) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Cargill and J. Beale, Ring for Catty, French’s Acting Edition (1956) pp. 28–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Elsom, Post-War British Theatre (1976; rev. edn 1979) p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Austin E. Quigley, The Pinter Problem (Princeton, NJ, 1975) pp. 148–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agatha Christie, Witness for the Prosecution, French’s Acting Edition (1954) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin Esslin, The Peopled Wound: The Plays of Harold Pinter (1970) p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosemary Casey, Late Love, French’s Acting Edition (1954) pp. 47–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ronald Hayman, Contemporary Playwrights: Harold Pinter (1970; rev. edn, 1974) p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pinter, in Twentieth Century, Feb 1961, p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katharine J. Worth, Revolutions in Modern English Drama (1972) p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jan Kott, Shakespeare our Contemporary (1965) pp. 112–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 David T. Thompson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, D.T. (1985). Rep Plays and Pinter Plays. In: Pinter. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07277-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics