Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities, Risk Taking, and Welfare
Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1953, p. 28) have made it very clear that their utility theory disregards the utility (or the disutility) of the act of gambling itself. It seems to me that the utility functions defined by their theory have often been misinterpreted by paying insufficient attention to this fact. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a more adequate interpretation of von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) utility functions.
KeywordsSonal Stake Americaine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. J. (1983) ‘Behaviour Under Uncertainty and Its Implications for Policy’, Technical Report no. 399 (Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency: Stanford University).Google Scholar
- Hausner, M. (1954) ‘Multidimensional Utilities’, in R. M. Thrall et al. (eds) Decision Processes (New York: Wiley) pp. 167–80.Google Scholar
- Hicks, J. R. (1939) Value and Capital (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar