Advertisement

Discussion of the Papers by McWhinney and Levenstein

  • David Pendleton
Chapter

Abstract

As a behavioural scientist, I approached the two papers having in mind the decision-making literature from my own discipline. If I set out the basics of this literature, my subsequent comments will become more intelligible.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cartwright, A. and Anderson, R. (1981) General Practice Revisited, London, Tavistock.Google Scholar
  2. Sutton, S. (1979) Can subjective expected utility theory explain smokers’ decisions to try to stop smoking? In Oborne, D. et al (eds.) Research in Psychology and Medicine Vol II. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Tuckett, D. (1982) Final report on the patient project. London, Health Education Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Pendleton 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Pendleton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations