Abstract
Chesterton and Booth attempt an understanding of both the positive and negative directions of rhetoric. Much of the current tension in rhetorical studies results from denying that rhetoric should concern itself with its negative counterpart. Unfortunately the popular opinion that all persuasion is negative cannot be answered by simple denial of concern. Both attitudes restrict and confuse the scope of rhetoric. The reactions of readers to Plato’s dialogues on rhetoric, Gorgias and Phaedrus, indicates the limits of the restriction. All too often readers concern themselves with one or the other depending upon whether they want to denigrate or uphold the art of persuasion. What they miss is that Plato moves from a single negative rhetoric to a recognition of both positive and negative directions. By acknowledging both, the Phaedrus is able to break through the limitations imposed on rhetoric by each partial view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1984 Lynette Hunter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter, L. (1984). Rhetorical Stance in Gorgias and Phaedrus. In: Rhetorical Stance in Modern Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07061-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07061-9_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07063-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07061-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)