Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic and Social History ((SESH))

  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

ARGUMENTS about whether or when a ‘Keynesian revolution’ took place in British economic policy in the 1940s have been bedevilled by lack of a clear definition of what such a revolution would imply. Winch [150: 281–3] was content to state that the Keynesian revolution was not limited to employment policy, but was best thought of ‘as a rational approach to the problems of economic management in general’, including price stability. Such a definition is too broad, however, unless it be conceded that Keynesian economists have a monopoly of rationality. The word ‘Keynesian’ itself has acquired too broad a meaning to be unambiguous, since it is applied to ideas of Keynes’s followers, and there has been lively debate about whether Keynes himself would have agreed with these ideas [64]. What follows is based upon the views of Keynes rather than those of his followers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 The Economic History Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peden, G.C. (1988). A ‘Keynesian Revolution’?. In: Keynes, The Treasury and British Economic Policy. Studies in Economic and Social History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07019-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics