Abstract
According to the time-hallowed anecdote, Edouard Manet, being asked which was the principal figure in a group he had painted, memorably replied, ‘The principal personage in a picture is the light.’1 Dickens, as the intimations of Bleak House began to cluster and cohere in his mind, wrote of ‘the first shadows of a new story hovering in a ghostly way about me’.2 The protagonist is light in one case and shadow in the other. But, like Manet, Dickens in Bleak House seems to be less interested in the people and objects in themselves than in them as seen — in the light that makes them lurid, or in the thickened atmosphere and many shadows and impediments to vision that insert themselves between the eye that sees and the object seen. The subject of Bleak House becomes, to an astonishing degree, less the physical slum of Tom-all-Alone’s, or the history of Esther’s quest for identity, or Richard Carstone’s degeneration, or the suit of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, than the mode of perceiving these things. What Dickens is looking at is the space between.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
My present source is The Outline of Art, ed. Sir William Orpen and revised by Horace Shipp (London: George Newnes, 1953) p. 553.
José Ortega y Gasset, ‘On Point of View in the Arts’, tr. Paul Snodgrass and Joseph Frank, Partisan Review, 16:8 (Aug 1949) 830–1.
This essay has been reprinted in the collection of Ortega’s essays The Dehumanization of Art and Other Writings on Art and Culture (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1956).
Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957). See esp. ch. 1.
Henry James, Preface to The Portrait of a Lady (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1908) pp. x–xi.
Charles Dickens, ‘Old Lamps for New Ones’, Household Words, 15 June 1850, p. 265.
John Forster, The Life of Charles Dickens, ed. J. W. T. Ley (London: Cecil Palmer, 1928) p. 328.
J. Hillis Miller, Charles Dickens: The World of his Novels (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958) p. 162.
William Hazlitt, ‘On Imitation’, The Examiner, 18 Feb 1816, p. 109.
See The Round Table in The Complete Works of William Hazlitt, ed. P. P. Howe (London: J. M. Dent, 1930) IV, 76.
See Catalogue of the Library of Charles Dickens from Gadshill, ed. J. H. Stonehouse (London: Piccadilly Fountain Press, 1935) p. 56.
See Leonée Ormond, ‘Dickens and Painting: The Old Masters’, The Dickensian, 79:3 (Autumn 1983) 146.
See Ian Ousby’s excellent article ‘The Broken Glass: Vision and Comprehension in Bleak House’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 29 (1975) 381–92.
See J. Hillis Miller, Introduction to Bleak House, ed. Norman Page (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971) pp. 7–34.
In an illuminating article on the lighting-effects in Bleak House George Ford points out that the image of windows becoming eyes is a recurrent figure in this and other novels — ‘Light in Darkness: Gas, Oil and Tallow in Dickens’s Bleak House’, in From Smollett to James: Studies in the Novel and Other Essays Presented to Edgar Johnson, ed. Samuel I. Mintz, Alice Chandler and Christopher Mulvey (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1981) pp. 183–210, esp. p. 194.
W. J. Harvey, Character and the Novel (London: Chatto and Windus, 1966) p. 99.
See the transcription of the working-plans in the Norton Critical Edition of Bleak House, ed. George Ford and Sylvère Monod (New York: W. W. Norton, 1977) p. 780.
Michael Steig misses Ada’s allegorical function as light, and misses the point of the title: “Light” refers only to Esther’s sudden realization that Ada and Richard are married’ — Dickens and Phiz (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978) p. 153.
Donald E. Ericksen, ‘Bleak House and Victorian Art and Illustration: Charles Dickens’s Visual Narrative Style’, Journal of Narrative Technique, 13:1 (Winter 1983) 37–8.
See Q. D. Leavis’s fine analysis of the passage in F. R. and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (London: Chatto and Windus, 1970) pp. 170ff.
See Ann Y. Wilkinson for an interesting discussion of the scientific aspects of this subject: ‘Bleak House: From Faraday to Judgement Day’, English Literary History, 34:2 (June 1967) 225–47.
Review in The Examiner, 8 Oct 1853, pp. 643–5. See Dickens: The Critical Heritage, ed. Philip Collins (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971) p. 291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Juliet McMaster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McMaster, J. (1987). Bleak House: ‘Looking on Darkness which the Blind Do See’. In: Dickens the Designer. Macmillan Studies in Victorian Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06933-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06933-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06935-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06933-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)