Skip to main content

Bleak House: ‘Looking on Darkness which the Blind Do See’

  • Chapter
Dickens the Designer

Part of the book series: Macmillan Studies in Victorian Literature ((MSVL))

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

According to the time-hallowed anecdote, Edouard Manet, being asked which was the principal figure in a group he had painted, memorably replied, ‘The principal personage in a picture is the light.’1 Dickens, as the intimations of Bleak House began to cluster and cohere in his mind, wrote of ‘the first shadows of a new story hovering in a ghostly way about me’.2 The protagonist is light in one case and shadow in the other. But, like Manet, Dickens in Bleak House seems to be less interested in the people and objects in themselves than in them as seen — in the light that makes them lurid, or in the thickened atmosphere and many shadows and impediments to vision that insert themselves between the eye that sees and the object seen. The subject of Bleak House becomes, to an astonishing degree, less the physical slum of Tom-all-Alone’s, or the history of Esther’s quest for identity, or Richard Carstone’s degeneration, or the suit of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, than the mode of perceiving these things. What Dickens is looking at is the space between.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. My present source is The Outline of Art, ed. Sir William Orpen and revised by Horace Shipp (London: George Newnes, 1953) p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  2. José Ortega y Gasset, ‘On Point of View in the Arts’, tr. Paul Snodgrass and Joseph Frank, Partisan Review, 16:8 (Aug 1949) 830–1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This essay has been reprinted in the collection of Ortega’s essays The Dehumanization of Art and Other Writings on Art and Culture (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957). See esp. ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henry James, Preface to The Portrait of a Lady (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1908) pp. x–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Dickens, ‘Old Lamps for New Ones’, Household Words, 15 June 1850, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Forster, The Life of Charles Dickens, ed. J. W. T. Ley (London: Cecil Palmer, 1928) p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Hillis Miller, Charles Dickens: The World of his Novels (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958) p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William Hazlitt, ‘On Imitation’, The Examiner, 18 Feb 1816, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See The Round Table in The Complete Works of William Hazlitt, ed. P. P. Howe (London: J. M. Dent, 1930) IV, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Catalogue of the Library of Charles Dickens from Gadshill, ed. J. H. Stonehouse (London: Piccadilly Fountain Press, 1935) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Leonée Ormond, ‘Dickens and Painting: The Old Masters’, The Dickensian, 79:3 (Autumn 1983) 146.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Ian Ousby’s excellent article ‘The Broken Glass: Vision and Comprehension in Bleak House’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 29 (1975) 381–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See J. Hillis Miller, Introduction to Bleak House, ed. Norman Page (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971) pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In an illuminating article on the lighting-effects in Bleak House George Ford points out that the image of windows becoming eyes is a recurrent figure in this and other novels — ‘Light in Darkness: Gas, Oil and Tallow in Dickens’s Bleak House’, in From Smollett to James: Studies in the Novel and Other Essays Presented to Edgar Johnson, ed. Samuel I. Mintz, Alice Chandler and Christopher Mulvey (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1981) pp. 183–210, esp. p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. J. Harvey, Character and the Novel (London: Chatto and Windus, 1966) p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See the transcription of the working-plans in the Norton Critical Edition of Bleak House, ed. George Ford and Sylvère Monod (New York: W. W. Norton, 1977) p. 780.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michael Steig misses Ada’s allegorical function as light, and misses the point of the title: “Light” refers only to Esther’s sudden realization that Ada and Richard are married’ — Dickens and Phiz (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978) p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donald E. Ericksen, ‘Bleak House and Victorian Art and Illustration: Charles Dickens’s Visual Narrative Style’, Journal of Narrative Technique, 13:1 (Winter 1983) 37–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Q. D. Leavis’s fine analysis of the passage in F. R. and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (London: Chatto and Windus, 1970) pp. 170ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Ann Y. Wilkinson for an interesting discussion of the scientific aspects of this subject: ‘Bleak House: From Faraday to Judgement Day’, English Literary History, 34:2 (June 1967) 225–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Review in The Examiner, 8 Oct 1853, pp. 643–5. See Dickens: The Critical Heritage, ed. Philip Collins (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971) p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Juliet McMaster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McMaster, J. (1987). Bleak House: ‘Looking on Darkness which the Blind Do See’. In: Dickens the Designer. Macmillan Studies in Victorian Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06933-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics