Conclusions and Prospects



This study has reviewed the current situation with regard to aviation fuel quality arising as the dynamic resultant between the constraints of supply and the requirements of demand. It also comments briefly on both the immediate historical background to this situation, and the alternatives that offer future potential. Aviation fuel quality and availability are seen to be influenced by such technological factors as production techniques, component control, measurement precision and the various aspects of service performance. Additional factors include the supply and demand of non-aviation fuels, particularly motor gasoline and diesel fuels, and thus the relative cost values of each of these products. In turn these costs, which have become of crucial importance in airline finances, are dominated by taxes, regulations and matters of a political, and possibly military, nature. An accurate prediction of the fuel quality likely to be available from the year 2000 is needed now to give the direction for future engine, fuel system and airframe design, research and development programmes. A new design concept started now will not be ready for commercial production until after the turn of the century. This prediction could also determine the potential life of existing equipment since it will highlight those modifications that will need to be carried out to operate on these fuels.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anon., ‘GA diesel on the way’, Flight International, 14 April 1984, p. 1009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon., ‘A dome to keep the cold out’, New Scientist, 8 March 1984, p. 26Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. C. Pfefferle, ‘Alternate fuels and the gas turbine catalytic combustor’, ASME 79-GT-142, Gas Turbine Conference, San Diego, California, March 1979 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. M. Goodger, ‘Future aviation fuels’, Symposium onPost-Petroleum Transport?’,Institute of Energy, University of Aston, April 1984 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Grosser, Gossamer Odyssey, Michael Joseph, London 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. H. Kolcum, ‘Electric powered Sikorsky S-52 nears hover testing in Florida’, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 30 January 1984, p. 52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Stansell, ‘Planes that fly by the Sun’, New Scientist, 25 June 1981, pp. 824–7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. M. Momenthy, ‘Fuels of the future’, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, ‘Charting a course for spaceship Earth’ meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, 25–27 May 1982Google Scholar


  1. I. I. Pinkel, Future fuels for aviation, AGARD Advisory Report No. 93, January 1976Google Scholar
  2. C. L. Blake, The impact of petroleum, synthetic and cryogenic fuels on civil aviation, DOT/FAA/EM-82/29, June 1982Google Scholar
  3. R. B. Whyte (ed.), Alternative jet engine fuels, AGARD Advisory Report No. 181, July 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eric Goodger and Ray Vere 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cranfield Institute of TechnologyBedfordUK
  2. 2.Esso Petroleum Co. LtdUK

Personalised recommendations