Abstract
This study has attempted to demonstrate empirically that in certain limited contexts in the interwar years, the pursuit of co-operative treaty-making strategies by nation-states significantly reduced the probability that the parties involved would subsequently go to war. It has also tried to show that the empirical relationship thus described is not simply a spurious statistical coincidence. Both the detailed quantitative analysis developed in Chapter 3 and 4 and the case-study examined in Chapter 5 lend strong support to the idea that co-operation — in the form of a commitment to the bilateral treaty-making process —constituted a significant causal factor in the complex balance of forces which enabled certain dyads to maintain peaceful relations even in the face of the general conflagration of 1939–45.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See, for example, Trevor Taylor, ‘Power Politics’, in Trevor Taylor (ed.), Approaches and Theory in International Relations (London: Longmans, 1978), pp. 122–40.
Roger D. Spegele, ‘Alarums and Excursions: The State of the Discipline of International Relations’, Politikon (South Africa), vol. 10, no. 1 (December 1983) pp. 54–7.
Copyright information
© 1986 David Sanders
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanders, D. (1986). Conclusion: Reconstructed Idealism and Revised Realism. In: Lawmaking and Co-operation in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06885-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06885-2_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06887-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06885-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)